# Depression Risk in Type 1 Versus Type 2 Diabetes: Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Body Mass Index (BMI) in a Nationally Diverse Cohort

**Authors:** Natalia Cruz‐Vespa, Michael L. Thomas, Michael J. McCarthy, Alejandro D. Meruelo

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/edm2.70172 · Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism · 2026-02-11

## TL;DR

People with type 1 diabetes and non-diabetic individuals have higher odds of depression compared to those with type 2 diabetes, with BMI playing a modest role.

## Contribution

This study reveals BMI's independent and partial suppressive role in depression risk differences between diabetes types.

## Key findings

- Type 1 diabetes and non-diabetic groups had higher odds of MDD compared to type 2 diabetes.
- BMI was independently associated with higher MDD odds.
- BMI modestly suppressed the depression risk difference between non-diabetic and type 2 diabetes groups.

## Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) commonly co‐occurs with diabetes, but comparative risk across type 1 diabetes (DM1), type 2 diabetes (DM2) and non‐diabetic groups—and the role of body mass index (BMI)—remains uncertain.

Using All of Us Research Program data, adults were classified as DM1, DM2 or non‐diabetic. Multivariable logistic regression estimated odds of MDD adjusting for age, sex at birth, race and ethnicity; BMI was added in secondary models. Effect modification by sex and race was tested. Structural equation modelling (SEM) assessed whether BMI statistically explained group differences.

In models excluding BMI, both DM1 and non‐diabetic participants had higher odds of MDD than DM2 (DM1 vs. DM2: OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.17–1.99; non‐diabetic vs. DM2: OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.16–1.25). Interactions by sex and race were significant; contrasts were stronger among females and heterogeneous across race strata. Adding BMI yielded directionally consistent group estimates and confirmed an independent association of higher BMI with higher MDD odds. SEM indicated statistical suppression for the non‐diabetic vs. DM2 contrast: non‐diabetic status related to lower BMI, while higher BMI related to higher MDD, producing a small indirect effect (~8%). The indirect path for DM1 vs. DM2 was non‐significant.

Compared with DM2, both DM1 and non‐diabetic groups show higher adjusted odds of MDD. BMI is independently related to MDD but only modestly—and partly suppressively—accounts for the non‐diabetic vs. DM2 contrast. Findings support subgroup‐aware screening and the need for longitudinal data to clarify mechanisms.

In a national All of Us cohort, major depressive disorder was more common in type 1 diabetes and non‐diabetic participants than type 2 diabetes. BMI was independently associated with depression and modestly suppressed non‐diabetic versus type 2 diabetes differences.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** Major depressive disorder (MONDO:0002009), Type 1 diabetes (MONDO:0005147), Type 2 diabetes (MONDO:0005148)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** DM1 (MESH:D009223), Depression (MESH:D003866), diabetes (MESH:D003920), type 1 diabetes (MESH:D003922), MDD (MESH:D003865), Type 2 Diabetes (MESH:D003924)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12894052/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12894052/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12894052/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12894052