# Engineering Biomimetic Nanoparticle Performance Through Fabrication Method Selection: Turbulent Jet Mixing, Microfluidics, and Extrusion

**Authors:** Ilana Elizarov, Rawan Mhajne, Ofri Vizenblit, Assaf Zinger

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202501770 · Small Methods · 2026-01-04

## TL;DR

This study compares methods for making biomimetic nanoparticles and finds that turbulent jet mixing and microfluidic mixing produce better results than extrusion.

## Contribution

The first use of high-resolution LC-MS/MS proteomics to compare membrane protein profiles across BNP fabrication methods.

## Key findings

- Turbulent jet and microfluidic mixing yield stable, protein-rich BNPs with improved targeting and reproducibility.
- Extrusion causes significant protein loss, reducing BNP performance due to shear stress.
- Proteomic analysis reveals fabrication method impacts on membrane-associated protein profiles.

## Abstract

Nanoparticle (NP) fabrication has advanced rapidly, driven by the growing role of nanomedicine in targeted drug delivery. Each fabrication strategy offers unique advantages and limitations. Here, we conduct a comparative evaluation of three prominent methods: turbulent jet mixing, microfluidic mixing, and extrusion, for producing biomimetic nanoparticles (BNPs). BNPs are emerging as next‐generation drug delivery platforms, combining liposomal biocompatibility with enhanced cellular uptake, prolonged circulation, and selective targeting, achieved by incorporating membrane proteins from source cells into synthetic lipid bilayers to confer cell‐mimicking functionality. Using neuron‐derived BNPs (“Neurosomes”) as a model, we systematically assess physicochemical and biological properties across fabrication methods and their impact on BNP function. Turbulent jet and microfluidic mixing produce BNPs with superior stability, higher membrane protein incorporation, improved batch‐to‐batch reproducibility, and enhanced targeting, whereas extrusion leads to diminished performance due to shear‐induced protein loss. Notably, this study presents the first application of high‐resolution LC‐MS/MS proteomics to quantitatively compare membrane‐associated protein profiles across fabrication methods. These results highlight the critical influence of fabrication techniques on BNP structure and function and provide actionable insights for optimizing production strategies, facilitating the scalable development of targeted nanotherapeutics.

Biomimetic nanoparticles (BNPs) combine liposomal biocompatibility with cell‐mimicking functions for targeted delivery. This study compares turbulent jet mixing, microfluidic mixing, and extrusion for BNP fabrication. Characterization, proteomics, and in vitro assays show that turbulent jet and microfluidic mixing produce stable, protein‐enriched particles with enhanced functionality, while extrusion induces protein loss. These findings establish optimal strategies for scalable nanotherapeutic design.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** NPPB (natriuretic peptide B) [NCBI Gene 4879] {aka BNP, Iso-ANP}
- **Chemicals:** lipid (MESH:D008055)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12893306/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12893306/full.md

## References

71 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12893306/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12893306