User Testing of Information Materials Developed for the Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Program: A Qualitative Study
Dan Luo, Kate L. A. Dunlop, Kathleen McFadden, Marianne Weber, Nicole M. Rankin, Claire Nightingale, Kate Broun, Hailey Fisher, Orelia Bello, Vivienne Milch, Rachael H. Dodd

TL;DR
This study gathered feedback from the public and healthcare workers on lung cancer screening materials in Australia to improve their clarity and effectiveness.
Contribution
The study introduces a user-centered approach to refining cancer screening information materials through community and health workforce input.
Findings
Participants emphasized the need for clear language and reliable content in the materials.
Visually engaging design and user-friendly formats were identified as important for diverse audiences.
Family influence and standardized smoking history assessment were highlighted as key improvements.
Abstract
The Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Program commenced in July 2025. This study aimed to explore the views of community members and the health workforce on the content, language, design and presentation of the draft information materials developed for the general population and health workforce. Semi‐structured interviews and focus groups were conducted between September and October 2024. Community members potentially eligible for the program and those interested in screening were recruited. Members of the health workforce who would be involved in screening were invited to participate. The teach‐back technique assessed community members comprehension of material content. An adapted user‐experience honeycomb model, along with a deductive thematic analysis approach, were used to identify aspects needing improvement. A total of 25 community members and 44 health workforce…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility · Health Sciences Research and Education · Delphi Technique in Research
