Baseline right bundle branch block and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a Danish nationwide cohort study
Daniel K Steiner, Maria L Krogager, Christoffer Polcwiartek, Claus Graff, Helle C Christensen, Mikkel P Andersen, Christian J Terkelsen, Evald H Christiansen, Jens C Nielsen, Mads B Kronborg, Anders M Sommer, Troels Thim, Julia Ellert, Jens B Johansen, Gintautas Bieliauskas

TL;DR
This study shows that pre-existing right bundle branch block increases the risk of needing a pacemaker after a heart procedure but does not raise the risk of heart failure or death.
Contribution
The study provides new nationwide evidence on the clinical impact of right bundle branch block in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients.
Findings
Right bundle branch block strongly predicts pacemaker implantation after the procedure.
It is not associated with higher rates of heart failure or all-cause mortality.
Findings were consistent at 90 days and one year post-procedure.
Abstract
In the largest nationwide study of Danish patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, we examined the clinical impact of pre-existing right bundle branch block – a known risk factor for permanent pacemaker implantation – on outcomes including pacemaker implantation, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. We included first-time transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients in Denmark from 2008 to 2021. Patients were stratified by baseline right bundle branch block status using the digital Danish Nationwide Electrocardiogram Cohort. The study outcomes were new pacemaker implantation, heart failure, and all-cause mortality at 30, 90, and 365 days. A composite of the study outcomes was also assessed. A total of 4900 patients were included, of whom 438 (9%) had baseline right bundle branch block. Mean age was 81 years, 55% were male. At 90 days, the overall pacemaker…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments · Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases · Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
