Acute Efficacy of Pulsed‐Field Ablation of the Mitral Isthmus Using a Pentaspline Catheter and Two Different Ablation Settings
Josef Hornof, Marek Hozman, Dalibor Heřman, Oleksii Romanenko, Sabri Hassouna, Jana Veselá, Věra Filipcová, Lukáš Povišer, Jakub Karch, Jana Hozmanová, Lucie Znojilová, Anna Molová, Vojtěch Pěnkava, Pavel Osmančík

TL;DR
This study evaluates how well pulsed-field ablation works for treating the mitral isthmus in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using two different ablation settings.
Contribution
The study introduces a comparison of two PFA settings for mitral isthmus ablation and reports acute efficacy outcomes.
Findings
Cohort B achieved a higher first-pass MI block success rate (70%) compared to Cohort A (33.3%).
Both cohorts achieved high final MI block rates (90% and 87.5%, respectively).
No major complications were observed in either cohort.
Abstract
There is limited data regarding the use of pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) for mitral isthmus (MI) ablation in patients with non‐paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Our aim was to assess the acute efficacy of MI ablation using a pentaspline PFA catheter with two different ablation settings. Patients with AF undergoing ablation were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation. MI ablation was performed in up to 4 series (9 PFA applications each) in Cohort A, or in up to 3 series (20 PFA applications each) in Cohort B. Each series was followed by a 20‐min observation period to verify the durability of the MI block. The primary endpoints were a first‐pass MI block and a final MI block after all ablation series. Between September 2024 and June 2025, 70 patients were enrolled: 30 in Cohort A and 40 in Cohort B. A first‐pass…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments · Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
