Evaluation of robotic exposure among gynecological surgeons: results of survey from the young European advocates of robotic surgery (YEARS)
Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez, D. El-Hamamsy, E. Karatrasoglou, A. Amirthanayagam, A. Muñoz Solano, C. Chollet, D. Galvin, M. Manpreet Kaur, C. Uwins

TL;DR
Young gynecological surgeons with more experience and regular access to robotic surgery feel more confident in using robotic techniques.
Contribution
This study identifies age and regular robotic surgery exposure as key factors in surgeons' confidence in robotic procedures.
Findings
Surgeons over 35 years old reported higher confidence in robotic surgery.
Regular access to robotic operating time is linked to greater confidence.
Structured training and higher institutional procedure volumes correlate with confidence.
Abstract
Study objective: To identify factors associated with higher self-perceived confidence in performing robotic surgery among early-career gynecologic surgeons, and to assess satisfaction with current surgical activity among young consultants. A cross-sectional survey consisting of a 28-item online questionnaire was developed and disseminated through the social media channels of the Young European Advocates of Robotic Surgery (YEARS) and the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). Eligible participants included gynecologists with exposure to robotic surgery who were either (1) still in specialty training or (2] within three years of completing their postgraduate training or fellowship. The questionnaire collected sociodemographic information, details on surgical experience, access to robotic platforms, and self-perceived confidence in different surgical approaches. Main…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSurgical Simulation and Training · Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments · Diversity and Career in Medicine
