ATTITUDE - Addressing attrition in longitudinal cancer cohorts: an in-depth qualitative analysis of experiences and perspectives on participation in longitudinal studies among breast cancer survivors
Elise Martin, Mariam Chichua, Camila Kelly Chiodi, Petya Zyumbileva, Pietro Lapidari, Martina Pagliuca, Emma Gillanders, Aude Barbier, Aurélie Bertaut, Diane Boinon, Anne-Laure Martin, Sibille Everhard, Liliane Golli, Christelle Jouannaud, Courèche Kaderbhai, Benoîte Mery

TL;DR
This study explores why breast cancer survivors participate in or drop out of longitudinal studies, aiming to improve retention and participant experience.
Contribution
The paper provides novel insights into participant motivations and challenges in longitudinal cancer studies to reduce attrition.
Findings
Participants joined the study for a sense of purpose and personal security.
Ongoing engagement was supported by flexible processes and a reassuring environment.
Attrition was linked to practical and emotional burdens and reduced connection to the study.
Abstract
Longitudinal studies are essential for investigating outcome evolution among cancer survivors. However, longitudinal designs pose specific challenges, such as attrition and premature dropout. We aimed to assess experiences and perspectives on participation in longitudinal studies among survivors of early-stage breast cancer, and inform interventions aiming to reduce attrition. Motivation, facilitators, challenges, and perspectives regarding participation in a longitudinal study were qualitatively assessed via interviews and focus groups. A thematic content analysis was performed. Between May and August 2023, 30 patients previously enrolled in the longitudinal CANTO cohort study (NCT01993498) were included: 17 participated in individual semi-structured interviews and 13 in two separate focus groups involving distinct participants. We identified four key themes: (1) joining the study as…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCancer survivorship and care · Ethics in Clinical Research · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
