Response to Letter to the Editor: “Conference on Medical Artificial Intelligence: Analysis Should be Based on Balanced Education and Audience”
Nafisa Islam, Abdel Rahman Osman

Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Machine Learning in Healthcare
To the Editors,
We thank Prof Shigeki Matsubara for their response to our study and are pleased that our paper was well received. Prof Matsubara ^(1)^ has raised many valuable points which we hope to address in the following response.
Addressing our sample size and selection first, we wholeheartedly agree that future work should seek to employ a larger sample size to increase statistical power and that conference attendees typically have fundamental artificial intelligence (AI) understanding as mentioned in our article. We would like to clarify that our paper states it is estimated that 100 attendees observed the National Health Service (NHS) National AI Conference at any given time as opposed to a single session ^(2)^.
With regards to the aims and design of the conference, we aimed to “educate health care professionals on defining AI, understanding its current uses and potential, the benefits and risks associated with integration in the NHS, and strategies to improve AI comprehension among the medical workforce”. To achieve this balanced approach, we involved multiple stakeholders, including four leading professionals in healthcare strategy and regulation, to ensure that we delivered a balanced and informed conference ^(2)^.
Finally, we would like to commend the suggestions Prof Matsubara ^(1)^ has put forward which will certainly guide future studies. For example, while our study was not designed to achieve this, comparing participant attitudes after teaching on AI safety as compared to AI benefits ^(2)^.
We are encouraged that our enthusiasm for educating medical professionals to make informed decisions about medical AI is shared.
Article Information
Author Contributions
We confirm that authors Nafisa Islam and Abdel Rahman Osman contributed equally to this work.
Conflicts of Interest
None
IRB Approval Code and Name of the Institution
None.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Matsubara S. Conference on medical artificial intelligence: Analysis should be based on balanced education and audience. JMA J. 2026;9(1):443-444.
- 2Islam N, Osman AR, Godfrey L. Evaluating conferences as a tool to improve medical artificial intelligence comprehension among healthcare professionals: a before and after study. JMA J. 2025;8(4):1283-92.41220512 10.31662/jmaj.2025-0175 PMC 12598227 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
