# Changing research trends in seed responses to stresses: a bibliometric analysis over the last 50 years

**Authors:** Zhouli Liu, Lin Qi, Benyang Hu, Yuchen Zhao, Hetong Wang, Nan Zhang, Xiangbo Duan, Binglun Li, Mingran Xin, Sihui Zhong, Hengyu Liu

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1691250 · Frontiers in Plant Science · 2026-01-27

## TL;DR

This paper uses bibliometric analysis to track global and Chinese research trends on seed responses to environmental stresses over 50 years, highlighting shifts in focus and collaboration.

## Contribution

The study systematically integrates global and regional research trends on seed stress responses using a large-scale bibliometric analysis spanning 50 years.

## Key findings

- Seed-stress research has evolved through three stages, with a notable increase in publications after 2020.
- International research focuses on salinity and oxidative stress, while domestic research emphasizes staple crops and practical indicators.
- Post-2020 frontiers include nanomaterials and signal transduction internationally, and cadmium pollution control domestically.

## Abstract

Abiotic stresses (e.g., drought, salinity, heavy metals) intensified by global environmental changes threaten plant seed germination, seedling establishment, and population persistence. Elucidating the spatio-temporal dynamics and adaptive mechanisms of seed stress responses is critical for ecological conservation and stress-resistant crop breeding, yet long-term global and regional research trends lack systematic integration.

A bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace v.6.4.R1 to process 15,627 literature records (9,042 from Web of Science; 6,585 from CNKI) spanning 1975–2024, focusing on publication dynamics, cooperation networks, intellectual base, research hotspots, and emerging frontiers.

Seed-stress research evolved through three stages (initial exploration, rapid growth, steady breakthrough), with WOS and CNKI seeing annual increases of 684 and 453 articles post-2020. China led in WOS publication volume, but cooperation networks showed low connectivity. International high-cited literature centered on salinity/oxidative stress (80% reviews), while domestic research focused on staple crop stress responses and practical indicators. Post-2020, international frontiers leaned toward nanomaterials and signal transduction, and domestic frontiers prioritized cadmium pollution control and germination regulation.

Global research presents a diverse, integrated landscape, while domestic research exhibits strong application orientation with relative fragmentation. Future research should integrate basic mechanisms with practical needs, strengthen interdisciplinary/international collaboration, and focus on combined stress adaptation and green regulatory technologies, providing theoretical and technical support for enhancing plant stress resistance and ecological security.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** cadmium (MESH:D002104)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12887857/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12887857/full.md

## References

84 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12887857/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12887857