# Patient-reported symptoms at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack as an indication of spontaneous stone passage/remaining ureteral stone or presence of urinary tract obstruction

**Authors:** Klara Sahlén, Pär Dahlman, Per Liss, Maria Lönnemark, Monica Segelsjö, Anders Magnusson

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/02841851251393798 · Acta Radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2025-11-25

## TL;DR

The study finds that patient-reported symptoms after a kidney stone attack are not reliable for determining if a stone remains or if there is urinary blockage, showing that imaging is still needed.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that symptoms alone cannot reliably detect ureteral stones or obstruction, emphasizing the continued need for imaging.

## Key findings

- Almost half of patients with a remaining ureteral stone reported no discomfort.
- A significant association was found between higher obstruction severity and reported symptoms.
- Imaging remains necessary to evaluate stone passage after a ureteral colic attack.

## Abstract

Patient-reported symptoms is considered a possible alternative to computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of remaining ureteral stones at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack.

To investigate patient-reported symptoms at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack in patients with a remaining ureteral stone and to assess the association of symptoms with degree of urinary obstruction.

This was a prospective study of 81 patients (68 men, 13 women; mean age = 59 years; age range = 23–88 years) referred for a follow-up CT after a ureteral colic attack with a remaining unilateral ureteral stone. A dynamic enhanced scan defined urinary obstruction. Stone size was the largest diameter of three multiplanar reformatations (axial, coronal, sagittal). Stone location was registered as proximal, mid-ureter or distal. Symptoms were registered in standardized questionnaires by the patient at the time of the follow-up.

In total, 43/81 (53%) patients reported symptoms. Obstruction of any degree was present in 16 (20%) patients. In 7 (100%) patients with moderate-severe obstruction reported discomfort attributed to the stone. In patients with mild obstruction, 5 (56%) reported discomfort; in patients with no obstruction, 31 (48%) reported discomfort.

Almost half of the patients at follow-up reported no discomfort despite having a stone in the ureter. A significant association was found between a higher degree of obstruction and reported symptoms. Asymptomatic stones and silent partial obstruction could be missed based on reported symptoms. Imaging is still required to evaluate stone passage at follow-up after a ureteral colic attack.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** urinary tract obstruction (MONDO:0003330)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ureter (MESH:D014516), urinary obstruction (MESH:D001748), Stone (MESH:D007669), ureteral stone (MESH:D014515), ureteral colic (MESH:D056844), urinary tract obstruction (MESH:D014552)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12886557/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12886557/full.md

## References

13 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12886557/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12886557