# Comparative study of the effects of VBT training with different velocity loss thresholds on lower limb explosive force of adolescent sprinters

## TL;DR

This study compares how different velocity loss thresholds in training affect the explosive leg power of young sprinters, finding that lower thresholds lead to better results.

## Contribution

The study introduces new evidence that lower velocity loss thresholds in VBT yield superior neuromuscular adaptations and performance gains in adolescent sprinters.

## Key findings

- Lower velocity loss thresholds (10%) produced greater improvements in explosive performance compared to higher thresholds (30%).
- All groups improved significantly in squat strength, sprint time, jump height, and reactive strength after 6 weeks of training.
- Higher velocity loss thresholds led to increased perceived exertion and fatigue accumulation.

## Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of velocity-based training (VBT) on lower-limb explosive performance in adolescent sprinters and to compare the training adaptations induced by different velocity loss thresholds (VLT).

Forty-five male adolescent sprinters were randomly assigned to three experimental groups that trained with VLT of 10% (G1), 20% (G2), and 30% (G3), respectively. All participants completed a 6-week VBT squat program performed twice per week at an intensity of 80% 1RM, with a fixed total volume of 20 repetitions per session. The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) was used to monitor subjective fatigue. Pre- and post-intervention tests included 30 m sprint performance, squat 1RM, countermovement jump (CMJ) height and relative peak power, and drop jump (DJ) reactive strength index (RSI). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and paired-sample t-tests.

After 6 weeks of training, all groups showed significant improvements in squat 1RM, 30 m sprint performance, CMJ height, CMJ relative peak power, and DJ RSI (p < 0.05). Between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in 1RM improvement (p > 0.05), whereas the 10% VLT group demonstrated significantly greater enhancements in CMJ height, CMJ relative peak power, 30 m sprint performance, and RSI compared with the 30% VLT group (p < 0.05). The overall trend in performance gains was consistent: 10% VLT > 20% VLT> 30% VLT. Monitoring data showed that sRPE values increased significantly with higher VLT (p < 0.001), indicating that lower VLT settings effectively reduced fatigue accumulation.

VBT is an effective method for improving lower-limb explosive performance in adolescent sprinters. Under fixed training volume conditions, applying a lower VLT (e.g.,10%) produces superior training outcomes, likely due to reduced fatigue, maintenance of higher movement velocity and power output, and enhanced neuromuscular adaptations. Coaches are therefore advised to prioritize lower VLT when designing VBT programs aimed at developing explosive strength in youth sprinters.

Comparative study infographic on the effects of velocity-based training (VBT) with different velocity loss thresholds on adolescent sprinters' lower limb power. It includes background on training methods, main findings comparing VL10%, VL20%, and VL30% across various performance metrics such as squat strength, jump height, and sprint time. Conclusions recommend lower velocity loss for improved strength and power. Logos and graphics illustrate key points.