# The effect of a familiarization critical speed testing session on critical speed determination during treadmill running

## TL;DR

This study found that a familiarization session before treadmill testing affects performance time but not critical speed estimates, with bigger effects in less fit individuals.

## Contribution

The study reveals that prior familiarization with testing procedures influences time to task failure but not critical speed estimation, with fitness level modulating this effect.

## Key findings

- Familiarization reduced time to task failure in constant-intensity trials compared to unfamiliar trials.
- Critical speed estimates were not significantly different between familiarized and non-familiarized conditions.
- Less fit individuals showed a larger familiarization effect, with a negative correlation between peak speed and time to task failure differences.

## Abstract

The effect of familiarization with the critical speed (CS) testing process on the outcome of CS tests has yet to be determined.

The main aims of the present study were to determine whether a familiarization session prior to CS testing sessions affects time to task-failure (TTF) on subsequent tests and CS estimations, and whether individual characteristics such as sex and fitness status influence any familiarization effect.

27 healthy adults (10 females, 25 ± 4 yrs) performed the following treadmill protocol: i) a maximal incremental test to identify peak speed; ii) a familiarization constant-intensity trial (CTfam) at the intensity of the first constant-intensity trial used for CS determination (CTCS), and iii) four randomly ordered maximal constant-intensity trials at ~ 85%, 92%, 98%, and 105% of peak speed. CS was estimated using 2-parameter hyperbolic, linear, and 1/time models including the CTfam (CS not familiarized) or the CTCS (CS familiarized). Familiarized and not-familiarized TTFs and CSs were compared using Wilcoxon tests. Sex effect was analyzed using Mann-Whitney test on the difference in the TTF between CTCS and CTfam. The correlation between peak speed and difference in the TTF between CTCS and CTfam was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation. α was set at 0.05.

CTfam TTF (399 [299] s, median [interquartile range]) was lower (p = 0.009) than CTCS TTF (495[316] s), whereas CS familiarized and not-familiarized were not different in any model (p > 0.05). Sex did not affect the differences between familiarized and not-familiarized TTFs and CS. However, differences in the TTF between CTCS and CTfam were negatively correlated with peak speed (ρ = −0.381, p = 0.050).

Familiarization with constant-intensity trials affected the TTF but not CS. Importantly, the familiarization effect was larger in less fit individuals, showing a negative correlation between the TTF differences (i.e., CTCS minus CTfam) and peak speed.