# Effects of velocity loss with blood flow restriction in full squat on strength gains, neuromuscular adaptations, and muscle hypertrophy

**Authors:** Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas, Luis Rodiles-Guerrero, Pedro Jesús Cornejo-Daza, Jose Antonio Paez-Maldonado, Clara Cano-Castillo, Beatriz Bachero-Mena, Miguel Sánchez-Moreno, Juan José González-Badillo, Eduardo Saez de Villarreal, Fernando Pareja-Blanco

PMC · DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.151657 · Biology of Sport · 2025-08-05

## TL;DR

This study found that moderate velocity loss during blood flow restricted squats improves strength and muscle growth differently than higher or lower velocity loss thresholds.

## Contribution

The study introduces specific velocity loss thresholds in blood flow restricted training and their differential effects on strength and hypertrophy.

## Key findings

- Low-to-moderate velocity loss (BFR20) maximized strength improvements in squats.
- Higher velocity loss (BFR40) promoted greater muscle hypertrophy.
- Extremely low velocity loss (BFR0) was insufficient for maximizing strength gains.

## Abstract

To analyse the effects of four full squat (SQ) training programmes with different velocity loss (VL) thresholds (0%, 10%, 20%, and 40%) with blood flow restriction (BFR) implementation on muscle size, lower limb strength, and neuromuscular adaptations. Forty-six strength-trained men carried out an 8-week (16 sessions) SQ training programme with BFR that differed in the VL attained within the set: BFR 0% VL (BFR0, n = 11), BFR 10% VL (BFR10, n = 11), BFR 20% VL (BFR20, n = 11), and BFR 40% VL (BFR40, n = 13). The same inter-set recovery (2 minutes), sets (3), intensity (from 55% to 70% 1RM), and level of BFR (50% of arterial occlusion pressure) were established for all groups. Before and after the training intervention, the following tests were carried out: 1) vastus lateralis muscle size; 2) countermovement jump; 3) maximal isometric SQ test; 4) progressive loading SQ test; and 5) fatigue SQ test. Muscle hypertrophy increased as the VL increased (“group × time” interaction: p = 0.013). Only BFR20 significantly improved force production at various time intervals (“group × time” interactions: p ≤ 0.05). Moreover, effect sizes suggest that low-to-moderate VL thresholds maximize the improvements in SQ strength against different loads (BFR0: 0.47–1.75; BFR10: 0.61–1.96; BFR20: 0.71–2.18; BFR40: 0.38–1.53). In BFR contexts, low-to-moderate VL thresholds should be prescribed to optimize leg strength performance. Extremely low VL (i.e., 0%) seemed insufficient to maximize strength gains, while higher VL thresholds are more effective for promoting muscle hypertrophy but may somewhat compromise strength improvements.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Muscle hypertrophy (MESH:C536106)
- **Chemicals:** BFR20 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884888/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884888/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884888/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884888