# Impact of Add‐On Hepatobiliary Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Ultrasound Hepatoma Surveillance for Liver Cirrhosis‐ a Randomized Study

**Authors:** Jing‐Houng Wang, Hsin‐You Ou, Yi‐Hao Yen, Chao‐Hung Hung, Sheng‐Nan Lu

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/kjm2.70104 · The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences · 2025-09-01

## TL;DR

This study compares ultrasound and MRI for liver cancer surveillance in cirrhosis patients, finding MRI may reduce diagnostic tests.

## Contribution

Annual hepatobiliary AMRI may reduce the need for additional diagnostic tests compared to ultrasound alone in HCC surveillance.

## Key findings

- No significant differences in nodule detection or HCC development between AMRI and US groups.
- Fewer diagnostic procedures were performed in the AMRI group compared to the US group.
- All HCC cases received curative treatment regardless of surveillance method.

## Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance with semi‐annual ultrasound (US) is recommended for high‐risk patients. This study investigates the impact of hepatobiliary abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AMRI) performed annually on the recommended US surveillance. Patients with compensated liver cirrhosis at regular HCC surveillance using US and alpha‐fetoprotein, with adequate renal function and without HCC diagnosis, were enrolled. Patients were randomized into add‐on hepatobiliary AMRI and continuous US surveillance groups. For patients in the AMRI group, gadoxetic acid‐enhanced AMRI was performed at enrollment and annually. Liver nodule detection, HCC diagnostic tests, and HCC development were compared between the two groups. One hundred and four patients were initially enrolled, with 15 patients excluded for loss of regular follow‐up, giving a total of 89 patients (AMRI: 45 and US: 44) that were analyzed in a median follow‐up of 33.6 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics nor statistical differences in hepatic nodule detections (AMRI:10 vs. US:18, p = 0.074) and HCC developments (1 vs. 6, p = 0.058) between the groups. While one HCC with a size of 1.2 cm (BCLC stage:0) was diagnosed in the AMRI group, six HCCs with a mean size of 2.4 cm (BCLC stage 0:2, A:3, B:1) were found in the US group. Compared with the AMRI group, there were more patients in the US group (18 vs. 9, p = 0.032) underwent dynamic imaging and/or biopsy. Curative treatments were performed for all patients with HCC. For compensated cirrhosis patients in the recommended US surveillance, hepatobiliary AMRI annually might reduce the frequency of HCC diagnostic tests.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** hepatocellular carcinoma (MONDO:0007256)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** AFP (alpha fetoprotein) [NCBI Gene 174] {aka AFPD, FETA, HPAFP}
- **Diseases:** Liver nodule (MESH:D017093), HCC (MESH:D006528), compensated cirrhosis (MESH:D005902), Liver Cirrhosis (MESH:D008103)
- **Chemicals:** gadoxetic acid (MESH:C073590)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884715/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884715/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884715/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884715