# Comparison of Masticatory Efficiency Between Single-Piece Implant-Supported Crowns and Conventional Fixed Partial Dentures for Single Posterior Tooth Replacement: A 12-Month Prospective Observational Study

**Authors:** Sujeet K Patil, Nagsen P Kamble, Sasankoti Mohan Ravi Prakash, Balaji Dhanraj Kendre, Khalid Mohammed AgwanI, Dev Kumar Garg, Rahul Tiwari, Heena Dixit, Seema Gupta

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.101229 · Cureus · 2026-01-10

## TL;DR

This study found that dental implants with crowns improved chewing efficiency more than traditional dental bridges over 12 months.

## Contribution

Demonstrated superior masticatory efficiency of single-piece implant crowns versus conventional FPDs in posterior tooth replacement.

## Key findings

- Implant group showed significantly higher masticatory performance at all time points compared to FPD group.
- Both groups improved over time, but implants showed greater functional adaptation.
- Masticatory efficiency gains were statistically significant at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment.

## Abstract

Introduction: Single posterior tooth loss impairs masticatory function, dietary choices, and quality of life. This prospective clinical study compared masticatory efficiency and functional adaptation between single-piece implant-supported crowns and conventional tooth-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) over a 12-month period.

Materials and methods: Sixty partially edentulous patients (aged 25-60 years) requiring single posterior tooth replacement were consecutively allocated into two equal groups (n = 30 each). Group 1 received single-piece titanium implants with cemented monolithic zirconia crowns after three-month osseointegration. Group 2 received conventional three-unit metal-ceramic FPDs. Masticatory efficiency was assessed at three-, six-, and 12-month post-loading using a standardized almond comminution test. The chewed particles were dried and sieved, and the masticatory performance (MP%) was calculated. Data were analyzed using independent-sample t-tests for intergroup comparisons and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-hoc tests for intragroup changes (p < 0.05).

Results: All 60 patients completed the study with comparable baseline characteristics. The implant group showed significantly higher MP than the FPD group at all time points: 28.4 ± 4.2% vs. 22.6 ± 3.8% at three months (p = 0.001), 32.1 ± 3.7% vs. 25.4 ± 3.9% at six months (p = 0.001), and 35.7 ± 3.9% vs. 28.3 ± 4.1% at 12 months (p = 0.001). Both groups improved significantly over time, with Bonferroni tests confirming significant gains between all the intervals in each group. The implant group showed greater improvement throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusion: Single-piece implant-supported crowns provided superior masticatory efficiency and faster functional adaptation than conventional FPDs for single posterior tooth replacement.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** edentulous (MESH:D007575), tooth loss (MESH:D016388)
- **Chemicals:** titanium (MESH:D014025), zirconia (MESH:C028541), metal (MESH:D008670)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884674/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884674/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12884674