# Generalisability of Maternal Genetic Risk Score for Birth Weight Across Racial Identity and Ancestry: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

## TL;DR

A genetic risk score for birth weight shows varying effectiveness across different racial and ancestral groups, suggesting the need for more diverse genetic studies.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the generalisability of a birth weight genetic risk score across diverse racial and ancestry groups in the U.S.

## Key findings

- The genetic risk score for birth weight was significantly associated with infant birth weight in White and multiracial groups.
- The association was not significant in Black, Asian, or unknown race groups.
- The genetic risk score showed significant associations in European and American ancestry groups but not in African or Asian ancestry groups.

## Abstract

Maternal genotypes may be useful to customise foetal growth assessment, but generalisability across diverse racial and ancestral groups remains uncertain. We assessed the generalisability of a genetic risk score for birth weight (GRSBW), derived from participants of predominantly European ancestry, within a diverse U.S. cohort.

Secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort of nulliparous patients.

Eight U.S. recruitment centers.

Participants in the parent study with available maternal DNA.

We used log‐linear modelling to test the association of maternal GRSBW with infant birth weight. We then assessed the robustness of the association by self‐identified race and genetically predicted continental ancestry (GPA) groups.

Birth weight.

Among 8147 eligible participants, GRSBW was positively associated with birth weight (p < 0.001). Across self‐identified racial groups, the association was significant in White (n = 5394, mean ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.97–1.11, p = 0.007) and multiracial (n = 508, mean ratio 1.10, CI 1.01–1.2, p = 0.03) groups but not in Black (n = 1139), Asian (n = 358), or unknown race groups (p > 0.09 for all). Among GPA groups, the association was significant among European (mean ratio 1.04, CI 1.02–1.07, p = 0.001) and American (mean ratio 1.08, CI 1.01–1.14, p = 0.02) ancestry groups but not African, East or South Asian, or unknown ancestry (p > 0.05 for all).

This GRSBW is not generalisable across self‐described racial identities or GPA groups, highlighting the need for globally representative genetic discovery cohorts as well as further investigation into the complex role of race, ethnicity, and epigenetic influences on foetal growth.