Knowledge and attitudes on sexual and reproductive health among adolescents and youths in Refugee Settlements: A case of Palorinya, Uganda
Cissie Namanda, Mary Nakafeero, Claire Biribawa, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, James Muhumuza, Muzamiru Tumwine, Charles Luwaga, Russell Dowling, Moses Otai

TL;DR
This study examines sexual and reproductive health knowledge and attitudes among adolescents and youths in a Ugandan refugee settlement.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into SRH knowledge levels and associated factors among refugee adolescents and youths in Palorinya, Uganda.
Findings
High knowledge of family planning (75%) and STIs (94.5%) was observed, but menstruation knowledge was low (6.5%).
Older age, monthly income, and being married were associated with higher SRH knowledge.
SRH knowledge was higher than previously reported in similar African refugee populations.
Abstract
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of refugee adolescents and youths is a neglected area with high unmet needs. This paper presents the levels and factors associated with Knowledge and attitudes towards SRH services in the same population in Palorinya settlement, Uganda. The cross-sectional study utilized proportional stratified sampling techniques to generate data from 801 participants. Knowledge of SRH focused on family planning, sexually transmitted infections, and menstruation. Multivariable modified Poisson and logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with knowledge and attitudes regarding SRH. Overall, knowledge of FP and STIs was high, at 75% and 94.5%, respectively, but knowledge of menstruation was low, at 6.5%. Having knowledge of FP was associated with age 16-19 years (APR 1.75, 95% CI=1.55-1.98), age 20-24 years (APR 1.86; 95%…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Characteristic | Total (N=801) | Col. Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 13-15 | 313 | 39.1 |
| 16-19 | 273 | 34.8 |
| 20-24 | 209 | 26.1 |
|
| ||
| Male | 263 | 32.3 |
| Female | 538 | 67.2 |
|
| ||
| None | 58 | 8.5 |
| Primary | 508 | 63.4 |
| Secondary/Tertiary | 225 | 28.1 |
|
| ||
| In School | 556 | 69.4 |
| Employed | 51 | 6.4 |
| Apprenticeship | 24 | 3.0 |
| Others | 170 | 21.2 |
|
| ||
| No income | 74 | 9.2 |
| < 50,000 | 603 | 82.9 |
| At least 50,000 | 124 | 17.0 |
|
| ||
| Not in union | 633 | 79.9 |
| In union | 151 | 20.1 |
|
| ||
| Catholic | 297 | 37.1 |
| Anglican | 138 | 17.2 |
| Pentecostal/Born Again/PAG | 313 | 39.8 |
| Other religion | 47 | 5.9 |
|
| ||
| South Sudan | 740 | 92.4 |
| Uganda | 61 | 7.6 |
| Knowledge of FP | Knowledge of STIs | Knowledge of Menstruation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Total(N) | N.(row%) | N.(row%) | N.(row%) | |
|
| 801 | 605(75.5) | 756(94.4) | 52(6.5) | |
|
| |||||
| 13-15 | 313 | 152(48.6) | 276(88.2) | 4(1.3) | |
| 16-19 | 279 | 247(88.5) | 273(97.8) | 19(6.8) | |
| 20-24 | 209 | 206(98.6) | 207(99) | 29(13.9) | |
|
| |||||
| None | 68 | 58(85.3) | 61(89.7) | 6(8.8) | |
| Primary | 508 | 331(65.2) | 471(92.7) | 18(3.5) | |
| Secondary/Tertiary | 225 | 220(976.8) | (224(99.5) | 28(12.4) | |
|
| |||||
| In School | 556 | 379(68.2) | 520(93.5) | 25(4.5) | |
| Employed | 51 | 50(98.0) | 51(100) | 2(3.9) | |
| Apprenticeship | 24 | 23(95.8) | 24(100) | 4(16.7) | |
| Others | 170 | 153(90.0) | 161(94.7) | 21(12.4) | |
|
| |||||
| No income | 74 | 42(56.8) | 73(98.6) | - | |
| Less than 50,000 | 603 | 442(73.3) | 560(92.9) | 40(6.6) | |
| At least 50,000 | 124 | 121(97.6) | 123(99.2) | 12(9.7) | |
|
| |||||
| Not in union | 639 | 446(69.8) | 596(93.3) | 33(5.2) | |
| In union | 162 | 159(98.1) | 160(98.8) | 19(11.7) | |
|
| |||||
| Catholic | 297 | 224(75.4) | 284(95.6) | 16(5.4) | |
| Anglican | 138 | 111(80.4) | 135(97.8) | 15(10.9) | |
| Pentecostal/Born Again/PAG | 319 | 237(74.3) | 294(92.2) | 14(4.4) | |
| Other religion | 47 | 33(70.2) | 43(91.5) | 7(14.9) | |
|
| |||||
| South Sudan | 740 | 563(76.1) | 700(94.6) | 50(6.8) | |
| Uganda | 61 | 42(68.9) | 56(91.8) | 2(3.3) |
| Background characteristics | Knowledge of FP | Knowledge of STIs | Knowledge of Menstruation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude PR (95%CI) | Crude PR(95%CI) | Crude OR (95%CI) | ||
|
| ||||
| 13-15 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| 16-19 | 1.82(1.61-2.06) | 1.11(1.05-1.16) | 5.65(1.9-16.81) | |
| 20-24 | 2.03(1.81-2.28) | 1.13(1.08-1.18) | 12.45(4.3-36.00) | |
|
| ||||
| Male | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Female | 0.97(0.89-1.05) | 0.99(0.96-1.03) | 1.89(0.95-3.74) | |
|
| ||||
| None | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Primary | 0.76(0.68-0.86) | 1.04(0.95-1.14) | 0.40(0.17-0.98) | |
| Secondary or tertiary[WU1] | 1.13(1.02-1.25) | 1.13(1.03-1.23) | 1.4(0.61-3.37) | |
|
| ||||
| In School | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Employed | 1.44(1.34-1.54) | 1.08(1.05-1.10) | 0.87(0.20-3.77) | |
| Apprenticeship | 1.41(1.27-1.56) | 1.08(1.05-1.10) | 4.25(1.35-13.37) | |
| Others | 1.32(1.22-1.42) | 1.01(0.96-1.05) | 2.99(1.63-5.50) | |
|
| ||||
| No income | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Less than 50,000 | 1.29(1.05-1.58) | 0.93(0.90-0.97) | - | |
| At least 50,000 | 1.72(1.41-2.10) | 1.01(0.97-1.04) | - | |
|
| ||||
| Not in union | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| In union | 1.41(1.33-1.49) | 1.07(1.04-1.09) | 2.44(1.35-4.42) | |
|
| ||||
| Catholic | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Anglican | 1.07(0.96-1.18) | 1.03(0.99-1.07) | 2.14(1.03-4.47) | |
| Pentecostal/Born Again/PAG | 0.99(0.89-1.08) | 0.96(0.92-1.01) | 0.81(0.39-1.68) | |
| Other (specify) | 0.93(0.76-1.13) | 0.94(0.85-1.04) | 3.07(1.19-7.94) | |
|
| ||||
| South Sudan | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Uganda | 0.9(0.76-1.08) 0.98(0.9-1.06) | 0.47(0.11-1.97) | ||
| Knowledge of FP | Knowledge of STIs | Knowledge of Menstruation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Adjusted PR(95%CI) | Adjusted PR(95%CI) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | |
|
| ||||
| 13-15 | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| 16-19 | 1.75(1.55-1.98) | 1.1(1.05-1.16) | - | |
| 20-24 | 1.86(1.63-2.12) | 1.12(1.06-1.19) | - | |
|
| ||||
| Male | - | - | 1.00 | |
| Female | - | - | 1.89(0.95-3.75) | |
|
| ||||
| None | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Primary | 0.88(0.79-0.98) | 1.04(0.96-1.13) | - | |
| Secondary or tertiary | 0.99(0.89-1.09) | 1.06(0.99-1.14) | - | |
|
| ||||
| In School | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Employed | 0.92(0.83-1.02) | 0.96(0.91-1.02) | 0.89(0.19-4.08) | |
| Apprenticeship | 0.97(0.84-1.11) | 0.97(0.92-1.03) | 4.4(1.41-13.73) | |
| Others | 0.9(0.81-1) | 0.93(0.87-1.01) | 3.28(1.74-6.20) | |
|
| ||||
| No income | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Less than 50,000 | 1.25(1.07-1.48) | 0.94(0.90-0.97) | - | |
| At least 50,000 | 1.33(1.12-1.59) | 0.97(0.92-1.02) | - | |
|
| ||||
| Not in union | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| In union | 1.09(1.02-1.16) | 1.05(1.00-1.09) | - | |
|
| ||||
| Catholic | - | - | 1.00 | |
| Anglican | - | - | 2.18(1.04-4.58) | |
| Pentecostal | - | - | 0.67(0.32-1.43) | |
| Other (specify) | - | - | 3.11(1.24-7.77) | |
|
| ||||
| South Sudan | 1.00 | - | 1.00 | |
| Uganda | 0.85(0.74-0.98) | - | 0.38(0.1-1.44) |
| Attitude and Perceptions questions | Agree | Disagree | Don't know | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freq | % | Freq | % | Freq | % | |
| No harm in having sex before 18 years? | 196 | 24.6 | 512 | 64.2 | 90 | 11.2 |
| It is a taboo to talk about sex in public | 492 | 61.5 | 232 | 29.0 | 76 | 9.5 |
| No harm in getting pregnant before 18 years | 184 | 23.0 | 534 | 66.8 | 82 | 10.2 |
| There is no harm when girls abort | 38 | 4.8 | 686 | 85.8 | 76 | 9.5 |
| Getting married before 18 years is harmless | 180 | 22.5 | 559 | 69.9 | 61 | 7.6 |
| Access to contraceptives is easy | 343 | 43.0 | 171 | 21.4 | 284 | 35.6 |
| You do not get HIV/AIDS when you have sex the first time | 141 | 17.6 | 461 | 57.6 | 198 | 24.8 |
| I find the behaviour of Health workers towards adolescents seeking SRH services to be acceptable to me | 535 | 66.9 | 73 | 9.1 | 192 | 24.0 |
| All contraceptives are harmful to my health | 136 | 17.0 | 377 | 47.1 | 287 | 35.9 |
| Early childbearing is dangerous (Probe below 18 years of age) | 709 | 88.9 | 55 | 6.9 | 34 | 4.3 |
| Contraceptive usage prevents pregnancy | 578 | 72.3 | 31 | 3.9 | 191 | 23.9 |
| Total | Positive attitude | Crude | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n(Row%) | PR(95%CI) | ||||
|
| N=801 | 449(56.1) | |||
|
| 13-15 | 313 | 137(43.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 16-19 | 279 | 166(59.5) | 1.36(1.16-1.59) | 2.07(1.42-3.01) | |
| 20-24 | 209 | 146(69.9) | 1.6(1.37-1.86) | ||
|
| |||||
| Male | 263 | 126(47.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Female | 538 | 323(60.0) | 1.25(1.09-1.45) | ||
|
| |||||
| None | 68 | 35(51.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Primary | 508 | 261(51.4) | 0.99(0.78-1.28) | 1.45(0.82-2.55) | |
| Secondary or tertiary | 225 | 153(68.0) | 1.32(1.03-1.69) | ||
|
| |||||
| In School | 556 | 289(52.0) | 1.00 | ||
| Employed | 51 | 28(54.9) | 1.06(0.81-1.37) | ||
| Apprenticeship | 24 | 16(66.7) | 1.28(0.96-1.72) | ||
| Others | 170 | 116(68.2) | 1.31(1.15-1.5) | ||
|
| |||||
| No income | 74 | 15(20.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Less than 50,000 | 603 | 356(59.0) | 2.91(1.84-4.6) | 6.44(3.39-12.23) | |
| At least 50,000 | 124 | 78(62.9) | 3.1(1.94-4.97) | ||
|
| |||||
| Not in union | 639 | 343(53.7) | 1.00 | ||
| In union | 162 | 106(65.4) | 1.22(1.07-1.39) | ||
|
| |||||
| Catholic | 297 | 156(52.5) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Anglican | 138 | 86(62.3) | 1.19(1.00-1.40) | 1.79(1.12-2.85) | |
| Pentecostal | 319 | 181(56.7) | 1.08(0.93-1.25) | 1.22(0.86-1.72) | |
| Other (specify) | 47 | 26(55.3) | 1.05(0.8-1.39) | ||
|
| |||||
| South Sudan | 740 | 416(56.2) | 1.00 | ||
| Uganda | 61 | 33(54.1) | 0.96(0.76-1.22) |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Global Maternal and Child Health · Migration, Health and Trauma
Introduction
By the end of 2019, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) had recorded a global population of forced displacement at 70.8 million, with 36.6% (25.9 million persons) officially classified as refugees and over half under the age of 181. As of 2020, Uganda was home to over 1 million refugees and asylum seekers, ranking it among the world's largest refugee-hosting countries and the largest in Africa1. The refugees in Uganda are hosted in settlements spread throughout the whole country, with approximately 61.7% from South Sudan and 29.3% from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Women and children account for 81% of the refugees from the DRC1.
Uganda has one of the youngest populations, with 42.2%of its population being below the age of 15 years and 25% being adolescents1. Adolescents range in age from 10 to 19 years, whereas youths range from 15 to 24 years2. Adolescent stages involve physical, cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial changes. This is a period where people get to experiment with everything since they feel independent, which increases their risk of health problems3. In Uganda, teenage pregnancy is 25%, and 16.9 is the median age at first sex4. Among the annual new HIV infections, 39% are among young people5.
Despite these challenges, sexual and reproductive health (SRH) remains overlooked, under-resourced, and lacking in the country6-8. Adolescents and youths face difficulty accessing reproductive health services such as voluntary, informed, and affordable family planning services, prenatal care, safe motherhood services, assisted childbirth from a skilled birth attendant, and the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV9. The prevention and treatment of violence against women and girls, safe and accessible post-abortion care, and sexual health information, education, and counseling are also lacking.
The situation is even worse in humanitarian settlements where there is increased vulnerability to sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancies10,11. A study conducted among refugee adolescent girls in Western Uganda reported that 11% had ever had sex12. In Bidibidi, a refugee settlement in the West Nile region in Uganda, 38% of adolescents reported having ever had sex9. A review of reports from different countries worldwide identified geographical accessibility, challenges with service availability, knowledge of services, and provider-client communication as some of the limitations to accessing SRH among refugees11. Other limitations include disruptions to family and social structures, poor living conditions, inadequate sanitation, and limited access to health services associated with conflict and displacement13. Additionally, the stigma associated with sexual activity during adolescence has been highlighted as another barrier to accessing SRH services6. It has been further underscored that forced migration increases the vulnerability of adolescents and youths, compromising their power to negotiate and make decisions related to sexual relationships6,14. Maternal health is one of the four key clusters of primary healthcare. This can be achieved through sexual and reproductive health and its rights. To accomplish these, strategies should take into consideration a safe sex life, the right to choose when to give birth, and access to SRH information. Thus, refugees should have access to correct information as well as safe, effective, and voluntary acceptable and affordable family planning methods and sexually transmitted preventive options. In addition, it should focus on safe motherhood services, prevention of sexually transmitted diseases, and sexual violence15.
There is limited information available on SRH among adolescents and youths in refugee settings16. To improve sexual and reproductive health (SRH) for adolescents and youths, we need to understand current knowledge and attitudes to identify tailored interventions suitable for this population in the context of conflict and displacement.
The available literature tends to report on the SRH needs of young people to improve the availability of family planning in refugee settlements, address language barriers, and adequately strengthen the inadequate capacity of healthcare workers17-19. A study by Ivanova, Rai, and Kemigisha11 in one of Uganda's refugee settlements found that health workers are not youth-friendly; in most cases, they judge and condemn adolescents for irresponsible behavior6.
A study was conducted to fill the knowledge gap and provide an overview of the situation regarding sexual and reproductive health knowledge, attitudes, utilization of, and access to services among adolescents and youths living in Palorinya Refugee Settlement and host communities in Obongi District, Uganda. This paper presents the findings on knowledge and attitude from that study.
Methods
Study setting
Palorinya refugee settlement was established in December 2016 and is located in Uganda's Obongi District in the West Nile region. The settlement currently hosts mostly South Sudanese refugees fleeing from the violent conflict in South Sudan. In 2023, the Palorinya settlement was estimated to host nearly 130,000 South Sudanese refugees, with a total surface area of 37.58 square kilometers17. The youths (adolescents and youths aged 15 – 24 years) comprise 25% (32,535) of the total refugee population and face most of the SRH challenges.
Study design and sampling
This cross-sectional design study involved collecting data through a household survey. The study targeted refugee adolescents aged 13-19 years and youths aged 20-24 years in both refugee and host communities in the Palorinya refugee settlement. Proportionate stratified sampling was used to select a commensurate number of households from each of the five zones of the settlement, as shown in Table 1 below. The selection criteria for respondents included gender, age (13-19 years old and 20-24 years old), willingness to participate in the study, informed consent from a parent or caregiver, and permission for minors. The study reached 801 households (participants), including 592 adolescents and 209 youths.
Data collection
For the quantitative data collection, smart mobile phones were programmed using the XML file format with the ODK (Open Data Kit) software and utilized for the exercise. The data were entered offline and only connected to the internet for uploading. The questionnaire was designed using validated tools: the Reproductive Health Assessment Toolkit for Conflict-Affected Women by the CDC21 and the Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Toolkit for Humanitarian Settings by UNFPA and Save the Children20.
Measurement of variables
Dependent variables
Knowledge of sexual reproductive health was measured by three variables: knowledge of family planning, knowledge of sexually transmitted infections, and knowledge of menstruation. For a respondent to be knowledgeable about family planning (FP), they should have heard about FP and a method of FP or should have possessed knowledge on the appropriate age for marriage. For someone to be knowledgeable about STIs, they should have known 2 out of 3 STIs, how to prevent STIs, and how HIV is transmitted. Knowledge of menstruation was measured by knowing the safe days during the menstruation cycle. To measure attitude variables, the study included 14 statements that asked participants to agree, disagree, or to respond ‘don't know.’ A positive attitude on SRH was defined as those who correctly responded to the 14 attitude questions. In contrast, those who had provided incorrect responses or did not know were taken to have negative attitudes. The constituting variables were summed up and converted into percentages. According to Bloom's cutoff points, those who scored 60% and above were categorized as having a positive attitude. In contrast, those who scored below 60% were classified as having a negative attitude (ref).
Data management and analysis
The data sets were password-protected, and after data collection, they were exported to STATA V15. A cleaning exercise followed to ensure the data were valid and consistent. Following this, an analysis was conducted using STATA version 15.0.
Frequencies and corresponding percentages were obtained to summarize the joint distribution of the background characteristics and measures of reproductive health knowledge and attitudes. To identify factors associated with knowledge of FP, knowledge of STIs, and positive attitude towards SRH, we used modified Poisson regression model which approximates risk/relative ratios better than the odds ratios from a binary logistic regression model (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9993252/#R17) given the high prevalence of these outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the associations between knowledge of menstruation and the exposure variables, given the low prevalence of this outcome. Robust standard errors obtained under the Modified Poisson regression also adjusted for clustering. Collinearity was ruled out using variance inflation factors (VIF) which ranged from 1.02 to 2.08. Variables that were significant at the 0.2 level at bivariable analysis were considered for the multivariable model. Backward model building was subsequently employed for each outcome variable in order to arrive at the final set of variables in a parsimonious model. The sparse counts of respondents aged 13 to 15 resulted into relatively large odds ratios with wide confidence intervals for the age variable when analysing knowledge of indicating instability in the parameter estimates. Age was therefore excluded from the multivariable analysis.. The goodness of fit of the statistical models was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The final multivariable model results presented in Tables 3 and 4 had p-values (FP = 0.8322, STIs=0.9988, menstruation=0.8578, attitude=0.8685), indicating that the models fitted the data relatively well. Prevalence and odds ratios are presented with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Makerere University, the School of Public Health Research Ethics Committee (Mak-SPH-REC), and subsequently from the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST), the government body responsible for approving all research projects in the country. This enabled the research team to seek ethical clearance for the assessment from the Office of the Prime Minister (OPM) Representative at the settlement level—the Settlement Commandant. At the zonal level within the settlement, permission to conduct the assessment was obtained from the chairpersons of the zonal Refugee Welfare Committee (RWC). No individual identifier information was collected on the data collection forms, and all data collection staff signed a data confidentiality form before conducting fieldwork.
Before enrolment in the assessment, all participants aged 18 and above provided written informed consent. For participants under 18 years of age, informed consent was obtained from their parents, guardians, or caregivers, followed by their assent.
Results
Social demographic characteristics of participants
Eight hundred and one adolescents and youths participated in this study. The majority (67%) (538/801) were females, and 74% (592/801) were adolescents aged between 13 and 19 years. The highest number of participants were of the Kuku tribe (70%) (562/801), nearly all of whom (92%) (740/801) are South Sudanese. Less than a third (28.1%) (225/801) had secondary or tertiary as their highest level of education, while the majority (63%) (508/801) had completed only primary-level education, with almost 10% (68/801) having no formal education. Most of these adolescents and youths were still in school (69%, 556/801) and were, therefore, single or unmarried (74%, 593/801). We noted that those who were married (61%, 125/206) got married between the ages of 16 and 19 as shown in table 1.
Knowledge of Sexual Reproductive Health among adolescents and youths in refugee communities
Knowledge of SRH was measured by three items: Knowledge of FP, knowledge of STIs, and knowledge of menstruation. Overall, Knowledge scores were highest for knowledge about STIs (94.5%), followed by knowledge of FP (75%). Knowledge of menstruation was very low (6.5%). About half (48.6%) of the adolescents aged 13-15 years had knowledge of FP, whereas nearly all (98.6%) youths aged 20-24 years were knowledgeable about FP. Knowledge of FP among those in school (68.2%) was less than those involved in other occupation categories (90-98%). For marital status, almost all refugees in the Union (98.1%) were knowledgeable about FP. The respondents from South Sudan had more knowledge of FP (76.1%) compared to the knowledge level of 68.9% among Ugandans living in the refugee communities. Knowledge of STIs was very high (over 88%) for all variable categories. There was not much variation in the studied characteristics. Knowledge of menstruation was minimal across all the studied characteristics. Among those with secondary education, only 14% had knowledge of menstruation, whereas other categories of this characteristic scored below 10%. Knowledge of menstruation for occupation was lowest for those employed (3.9%) and in school (4.5%) compared to those in apprenticeship (16.7%) as indicated in table 2.
Key determinants of knowledge of FP and STIs were age, education, occupation, income, and marital status, while those for menstruation were age, gender, education, occupation, marital status, and religion as ported in Table 3.
After multivariable analysis, adolescents who were aged 16-19 years and youths 20- 24 years had almost two times the prevalence of knowledge of FP (APR 1.75, 95% CI=1.55- 1.98) and (APR 1.86, 95% CI=1.63- 2.12) compared to younger adolescents of age 13- 15 years. Participants with primary education had a 12% lower prevalence of being knowledgeable about FP (APR 0.88, 95% CI= 0.79-0.98) than those without education. Adolescents and youths who earned less than Ugx 50,000 or at least Ugx 50,000 had a prevalence of 25% (APR 1.25; 95% CI =1.07-1.48) or 33% (AOR 1.33; 95% CI=1.12- 1.59) more prevalence, respectively, compared to those who did not have any income. Ugandan adolescents and youths had a 15% lower prevalence of knowledge in FP (APR 0.85; 95% CI = 0.74-0.98) compared to those from South Sudan. There was marginal significance in the knowledge of FP across different categories of marital status and religion as indicated in table 4.
Knowledge of STIs was 6% higher among participants who reported having secondary or tertiary education as their highest level of education (APR 1.06; 95% CI = 0.99-1.14) compared to those with no education. Knowledge of STIs was 11% higher among those aged 16-19 years (APR 1.1; 95% CI= 1.05-1.16) compared to adolescents 13-15 years. There was marginal significance for occupation, monthly income, and marital status.
The odds of knowledge of menstruation were almost two times higher among females (AOR 1.89; CI=0.95- 3.75) compared to males. Participants who were involved in the apprenticeship were four times (AOR 4.4; 95% CI=1.41-13.73) more likely to know about menstruation compared to those in school. Uganda participants had 62% lower odds of knowing about menstruation compared to refugees from South Sudan.
Attitude on Sexual Reproductive Health among adolescents and youths in refugee communities
To assess attitudes toward SRH, participants were asked to either agree, disagree, or answer a statement. When the respondents were asked if there was no harm in having sexual intercourse below 18 years, 25% agreed, although 11% did not know whether it was okay or not to have sexual intercourse while below 18 years. More than half agreed that it was taboo to talk about sex in public, while 9.5% did not know. Equally important is that about 23% of the participants agreed that getting married before 18 years is harmless, and 18% did not think that having sex shows love for your partner or not. More than 18% of the participants also believe that when you have sex for the first time, you do not get HIV/AIDS, while others did not know (25%) as indicated in Table 5
Factors associated with the attitude of adolescents and youths toward SRH
From bivariate and multivariable analyses of adolescents' and youths' attitudes towards SRH, the prevalence of positive attitude was two times for adolescents aged 16-19years (APR 2.07; 95% CI=1.42- 3.01) and almost three times more for youths 20-24 years (APR 2.92; 95% CI=1.81- 4.71) compared to the adolescent aged 13-15years. Women were twice as likely to have a positive attitude (APR 1.97; 95% CI=1.43- 2.72) compared to men. Participants with secondary or tertiary education had almost twice the prevalence of positive attitudes compared to those with no education. Equally important were participants who reported having some income. Those who earned less than Ugx 50,000 and those who earned at least Ugx 50,000 were 6.4 and 4.8 times more likely to have positive attitudes, respectively, compared to those with no income as presented from Table 6.
Discussion
The study found a high level of knowledge of FP and STI but a very low knowledge of Menstruation. This knowledge among adolescents and youths varied by age, gender, education level, marital status, and income, as reported in other studies21. Our findings indicate a higher level of knowledge of FP and STI compared to the 44% reported by Finlay et al. among SSA adolescent. The difference in the two studies may be explained by the different ages of the respondents. In our study, the sample consisted of individuals aged 13-24 years, whereas the study by Finlay et al. focused on adolescents aged 10-19 years22.
The majority of the participants had primary as their highest level of education; this group had a lower level of knowledge of FP. This will have an impact on their FP choices and fertility, leading to unplanned pregnancies23. Knowledge of SRH was generally lower among young adolescents compared to older age groups. This is a similar finding to what was reported in Ghana, where adolescents had little or no knowledge of reproductive health services.
The findings from our study of high levels of Knowledge on STIs is in line with a study among migrants and refugees from Sydney and Australia who reported high awareness of STIs24.
The majority of refugees lacked knowledge about menstruation. Similar findings have been reported in Bangladesh, where adolescent girls reported limited knowledge of menstruation22. However, our study has even much lower level compared to a report on SRH conducted across SSA. The level of knowledge about menstruation may be due to the difference in population, as our respondents were from refugee settings, which increased their vulnerability to limited knowledge6.
Knowledge on menstruation was slightly higher among females than males, which is similar to what was reported in Malaysia25. The difference may be explained by the fact that females experience menstruation and menstrual products as reported in the study conducted among young adults26.
Attitudes towards SRH increased with age, education, and income status, and were more prevalent among females. A study conducted among refugees in Guinea reported that women had fewer misconceptions about SRH concepts like bad touch. The same study reported that participants with some formal education were more likely to have a positive attitude toward SRH27.
Conclusion
A high number of adolescents and youths living in refugee and refugee-hosting communities in Obongi District had high knowledge of FP, though they possessed limited knowledge of menstruation. Knowledge of SRH increased with age. Females were more knowledgeable about menstruation and had more positive attitudes to SRH. Ugandans who stayed within the refugee setting were less knowledgeable about SRH. Attitude improved with age, education level, and income status. We recommend including information on menstruation as part of SRH. Family planning and STIs should be introduced earlier, as young adolescents tend to have less knowledge of family planning.
The strength of the paper lies in its study of both adolescents and youths.
Limitations
As this is a secondary data analysis, we did not have access to all the variables necessary to measure sexual reproductive health knowledge, and some variables were not measured appropriately. Some variable categories have sparse cells, resulting in prevalence or odds ratios with wide confidence intervals.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1UBOS The National Population and Housing Census 2024, in Main report 2024 Kampala Uganda Bureau of Statistics
- 2WHO Guidance for countries to assess Adolescent Health and Well-being, in A review of literature andprojects 20052025 World Health Organisation
- 3UNFPA, S.t.c.a Adolescent Sexual And Reproductive Health Toolkit for Humanitarian Settings in A Companion to the Inter-Agency Field Manual on Reproductive Health in Humanitarian Settings 2009 New York, USA United Nations Population Fund
- 4NPC The state of Uganda Population Report 2022, in Accelerate demographic transition: Refocus investments to attain a favourable population age structure for sustainable development 2023 Kampala National Population Council
- 5UAC 2024 Uganda HIV and AIDS Fact Sheet 2024 Uganda AI Ds Commission: Uganda AIDS Commission
- 6Ivanova O Rai M Kemigisha EA systematic review of sexual and reproductive health knowledge, experiences and access to services among refugee, migrant and displaced girls and young women in Africa International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 201815815833004994010.3390/ijerph 15081583 PMC 6121882 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Chandra-Mouli V Twenty years after International Conference on Population and Development: where are we with adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights?Journal of Adolescent Health 2015561 S 1S 610.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.01525528975 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Woog VKågesten A The sexual and reproductive health needs of very young adolescents aged 10–14 in developing countries: what does the evidence show?2017
