# Exploring antibiotic stewardship interventions within a One Health context: a scoping review

**Authors:** Léo Delpy, Chloe Clifford Astbury, Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa, Mouhamadou Moustapha Sow, Sandrina Vandenput, Cécile Aenishaenslin, Arne Ruckert, Ria Benko, Mary Wiktorowicz, Tarra L. Penney, A. M. Viens, Marion Bordier

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1707695 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2026-01-26

## TL;DR

This study reviews antibiotic stewardship interventions through a One Health lens to better understand how they address antibiotic resistance across humans, animals, and the environment.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of antibiotic stewardship interventions from a One Health perspective through a scoping review.

## Key findings

- The 29 interventions focused on communication, access to antibiotics, and disposal.
- Interventions varied in collaboration across sectors and equity considerations.
- Human health objectives dominated, with a need for stronger evaluation of implementation impacts.

## Abstract

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) presents a global threat to human health, animal health, and the environment. While ABR is a natural phenomenon, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in human health, animal health, and food production is a major driver of ABR. As interactions between humans, animals, and the environment are central to the emergence and spread of ABR, adopting a One Health approach is essential to effectively address the issue. In this context, a large range of antibiotic stewardship interventions has been developed to optimize the use of antibiotics. However, we lack a comprehensive overview of the landscape of antibiotic stewardship interventions from a One Health perspective. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of existing policy interventions. The literature review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We systematically searched three major databases to retrieve interventions meeting our inclusion criteria. We purposively sampled some of these interventions to illustrate the diversity of existing interventions. These sampled interventions were then assessed according to 26 variables related to their general characteristics, development and implementation mode, scope, One Health and equity dimensions, and impacts. We conducted a descriptive analysis on the data extracted to summarize the characteristics of the antibiotic stewardship interventions. The 29 selected interventions focus on communication with stakeholders and the general public, access to antibiotics and their usage, and antibiotic disposal. Regarding their One Health aspects, the interventions varied in terms of collaboration across sectors and levels, engagement with the private sector, and equity considerations. Strong livestock industry engagement, efficient legal and institutional frameworks and provision of alternatives to antibiotics acted as facilitators to intervention implementation and success. Interventions demonstrated effects in terms of changes in antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, awareness, and practices, as well as impacts on animal health and productivity. This study highlights the persistent dominance of human health objectives in the design and implementation of One Health antibiotic stewardship interventions and the continuous need to strengthen evaluation of such interventions to better understand facilitators and barriers to their implementation as well as intervention impacts.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12883812/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12883812/full.md

## References

76 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12883812/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12883812