# Methods and Instruments to Measure ICU Healthcare Professionals' Workload Related to Medical Technology—Protocol for a Scoping Review

**Authors:** Geertje J. C. van Limpt, Manon A. Molenaar, Faridi S. Jamaludin, Catharina J. van Oostveen, Frederique Paulus, Marcus J. Schultz, Peter van Vliet, Laura A. Buiteman‐Kruizinga

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/nicc.70373 · Nursing in Critical Care · 2026-02-07

## TL;DR

This paper outlines a protocol for a scoping review to identify methods for measuring ICU healthcare professionals' workload related to medical technology.

## Contribution

It introduces a structured protocol to categorize workload measurement methods by domain, task type, and technology.

## Key findings

- The review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
- It will exclude pediatric studies and patient-based scoring systems.
- Findings will be synthesized narratively and presented in visual formats.

## Abstract

Healthcare systems increasingly adopt medical technologies in direct patient care, particularly in highly technological environments like intensive care units (ICUs). While these technologies aim to enhance clinical outcomes, they can also introduce complexities that affect healthcare professionals' workload. Measuring workload related to the use of medical technology is crucial to ensure technologies support rather than hinder care delivery. Workload in this context encompasses temporal demands, subtask frequency and cognitive demands—distinct from scoring systems determining staffing ratios.

To identify methods and instruments to measure ICU healthcare professionals' workload during direct patient care activities involving medical technology.

We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, using narrative synthesis to summarise findings. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Google Scholar will be searched for studies published 2010–2025 reporting primary data. Exclusion criteria: paediatric population, editorials, letters and patient‐based scoring systems (e.g., Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System–76; Nursing Activities Score). Two reviewers will independently screen records and extract data using standardised forms. Reporting quality will be assessed using a self‐developed tool. Findings will be presented in a flowchart, tables and figures.

This review will provide a comprehensive overview of workload measurement methods during direct patient care activities involving medical technology in ICUs, serving as a practical resource for evaluating the workload impact of existing and emerging technologies.

Open Science Framework, registered on 26th of September 2024 (registration DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/2A97J, https://osf.io/2a97j/)

What is known about the topic
○Measuring healthcare professionals' workload related to the use of medical technology in the ICU is crucial to ensure new and evolving technologies support rather than hinder effective care delivery.○Workload is a multidimensional concept and various workload measurement methods exist.
What this paper adds
○A protocol to identify workload measurement methods and instruments from the ICU healthcare professional's perspective during direct patient care activities involving medical technology.○A protocol for a categorisation of workload measurement methods structured by workload domain (temporal, subtask frequency, performance‐, subjective‐ or psychophysiological‐based), type of task and type of medical technology.

What is known about the topic
○Measuring healthcare professionals' workload related to the use of medical technology in the ICU is crucial to ensure new and evolving technologies support rather than hinder effective care delivery.○Workload is a multidimensional concept and various workload measurement methods exist.

Measuring healthcare professionals' workload related to the use of medical technology in the ICU is crucial to ensure new and evolving technologies support rather than hinder effective care delivery.

Workload is a multidimensional concept and various workload measurement methods exist.

What this paper adds
○A protocol to identify workload measurement methods and instruments from the ICU healthcare professional's perspective during direct patient care activities involving medical technology.○A protocol for a categorisation of workload measurement methods structured by workload domain (temporal, subtask frequency, performance‐, subjective‐ or psychophysiological‐based), type of task and type of medical technology.

A protocol to identify workload measurement methods and instruments from the ICU healthcare professional's perspective during direct patient care activities involving medical technology.

A protocol for a categorisation of workload measurement methods structured by workload domain (temporal, subtask frequency, performance‐, subjective‐ or psychophysiological‐based), type of task and type of medical technology.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** OSF (MESH:D005597)
- **Chemicals:** MMAT (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Cell lines:** TISS-76 — Homo sapiens (Human), Lung adenocarcinoma, Cancer cell line (CVCL_Z022)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12883006/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12883006/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12883006