# Urine Analysis as a Reliable Indicator of a Urinary Tract Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study

**Authors:** Zaraq R Khan, Zeeshan Ullah, Adel Alwakeedi, Imad Majeed, James Snyder

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.101074 · Cureus · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study shows that urine analysis alone is not a reliable way to diagnose urinary tract infections, which can lead to unnecessary antibiotic use.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the correlation between urine analysis results and true UTI diagnoses to address overdiagnosis issues.

## Key findings

- Only 17% of patients with positive urine analysis had a confirmed UTI based on the study's criteria.
- Most UTI cases (76%) were in females, and 77% of patients with positive urine analysis were asymptomatic.

## Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common clinical entities encountered by physicians in a healthcare setup. The fact that there are no definitive criteria for diagnosing a UTI, leads to overdiagnosis and hence excessive use of antibiotics which eventually leads to multi-drug resistant microorganisms.

Objectives: To determine the correlation of positive urine analysis based on greater than 10 white blood cell count (WBC)/high power field (HPF) with a true UTI according to our operational definition.

Methods: This study is a cross-sectional retrospective study. The patient population to be studied consists of in-patients and patients being evaluated in the emergency room in the University of Louisville Healthcare (UofL Health) network. A target of 100 patients was set as a goal for our study. A non-randomized consecutive sampling was done. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Descriptive statistics, including means ± SDs for quantitative variables and frequencies/percentages for qualitative variables, were computed.

Results: Our study included 100 patients, with a gender distribution of 48% male and 52% female, and a mean age of 59.62 years (SD = 17.56, range: 20-94 years). UTI diagnoses were established in 17% of cases as per our operational definition in which the majority were female (76%). Symptomatic presentation was observed in 23% of the cohort, while the majority (77%) remained asymptomatic.

Conclusion: Urine analysis is not always a true indicator of a UTI and hence hospital policy of doing a reflex culture to a positive urine analysis should be discouraged as it leads to overdiagnosis and, hence, unnecessary use of antibiotics.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** Urinary Tract Infection (MONDO:0005247), UTI (MONDO:0005247)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** UTI (MESH:D014552)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882473/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882473/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882473/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882473