# Sex differences in pain-related biopsychosocial assessments in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

**Authors:** Yvonne Maria van der Kraan, Davy Paap, Hans Timmerman, Freke Wink, Suzanne Arends, Michiel Reneman, Anneke Spoorenberg

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s13075-025-03725-2 · Arthritis Research & Therapy · 2026-01-09

## TL;DR

The study found that men and women with axial spondyloarthritis experience and report pain differently, suggesting the need for sex-specific approaches in pain management.

## Contribution

This study is novel in exploring sex differences in a broad range of biopsychosocial pain assessments in axial spondyloarthritis patients.

## Key findings

- Women reported higher pain severity and different pain sensitivity compared to men.
- Women used different coping strategies and had distinct psychosocial profiles related to pain.
- Factors associated with pain-related disease activity differ between sexes.

## Abstract

In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), (back)pain is the key symptom and often linked to inflammation. However, knowledge on sex-related differences in pain is limited. Therefore, our study aim was to explore sex differences in a broad spectrum of pain-related biopsychosocial assessments in patients with axSpA.

Explorative cross-sectional study from Groningen Leeuwarden axSpA (GLAS) cohort. Following assessments were performed: pain-related questions 2–4 of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), quantitative sensory testing, including pain pressure threshold (PTT), temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation, and questionnaires assessing central sensitization, illness perception, coping strategies, anxiety/depression, and pain-related worrying. Effect sizes (ES) were interpreted as small (< 0.5), moderate (0.5–<0.8), or large (≥ 0.8). Univariable linear regression explored variables associated with BASDAI backpain question 2.

128 men and 73 women were included. Women scored higher on the BASDAI questions, had lower PPTs, higher CSI values (41.5 ± 13.6 vs. 30.6 ± 13.8; ES = 0.79) and used more often comforting cognitions (29.9 ± 4.1 vs. 27.8 ± 4.9; ES = 0.51), decreasing activity (21.0 ± 4.3 vs. 18.8 ± 4.5; ES = 0.49), and diverting attention (22.3 ± 3.9 vs. 20.1 ± 4.7; ES = 0.78) as coping strategies than men. Regression analysis demonstrated that factors associated with pain-related disease activity differ between sexes with varying R2.

Our study suggests that men and women with axSpA show distinct patterns in pain-related biopsychosocial assessments. Women reported higher pain severity, different pain sensitivity, psychosocial profiles and associations with pain. These findings support the importance of addressing pain differently between sexes in clinical practice.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146), axial spondyloarthritis (MESH:D000089183)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882121/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882121/full.md

## References

3 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882121/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12882121