# Development and standardisation of ‘time-in-range’ measurement for clinical endpoints in retinal diseases

**Authors:** Luisa Frizziero, Jane Barratt, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung, Andrii Korol, Edoardo Midena, James Talks, Miltiadis Tsilimbaris, Ian Pearce, Igor Kozak

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-04112-6 · Eye · 2025-12-16

## TL;DR

This paper explores using 'time-in-range' as a new way to measure treatment outcomes in retinal diseases, focusing on how it can track disease progression and treatment effects over time.

## Contribution

The paper introduces 'time-in-range' as a novel endpoint for evaluating retinal diseases, particularly exudative conditions affecting the posterior pole of the eye.

## Key findings

- Current retinal disease evaluation relies heavily on 'mean change' in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
- 'Time-in-range' could provide a more comprehensive view of disease fluctuations and treatment effects in retinal conditions.
- The metric may also be applicable to other endpoints like macular thickness in ocular diseases.

## Abstract

Clear and updated endpoints are required to measure outcomes of a disease course and/or a therapeutic intervention. The aim of this review is to identify a reliable ‘time-in-range’ endpoint of clinical outcomes in ocular conditions, with a particular focus on exudative diseases involving the posterior pole of the eye, and to explore possible applications of this endpoint. A PubMed search was carried out pertaining to: ‘time-in-range’, ‘clinical-outcome’, ‘clinical-endpoint’, ‘clinical trial’, ‘metrics’, ‘retina’, ‘retinopathy’, ‘macular-oedema’, ‘maculopathy’, ‘ophthalmology’, ‘visual-function’, ‘visual acuity end-point’ and ‘OCT’. The results showed that both functional and morphological endpoints have been used in the evaluation of retinal diseases. At present, the most widely accepted and clinically meaningful marker of ocular disease is ‘mean change’ in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). While comparisons to baseline at various timepoints are commonly recommended to evaluate statistical and clinically relevant differences, few metrics capture the disease course continuously over time. In other medical fields, ‘time-in-range’ has been introduced to provide more complete information on the fluctuations characterising the course of a disease. The application of ‘time-in-range’ on BCVA in exudative diseases involving the posterior pole seems feasible, reliable and applicable in clinical practice. BCVA ‘time-in-range’ offers a useful and practical endpoint in retinal diseases, evaluating both visual function at the end of an observation/treatment and fluctuations in disease over time. It may also be applied to other clinical and morphological endpoints in ocular diseases, including macular thickness. This review presents a hypothesis-generating framework proposing ‘time-in-range’ as a supplementary metric, pending prospective validation.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** retinopathy (MONDO:0005283)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** macular-oedema (MESH:D008269), retinopathy (MESH:D058437), maculopathy (MESH:D008268), ocular disease (MESH:D005128), retinal diseases (MESH:D012164), exudative diseases (MESH:D011504)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12881455/full.md

## References

4 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12881455/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12881455