# Appropriate normalization is critical to improve reproducibility of tissue ChIP-seq

**Authors:** Qi Chu, Liu Peng, Lourdes Brea, Viriya Keo, Xiaodong Lu, Jindan Yu, Jonathan C. Zhao

PMC · DOI: 10.17161/sjm.v2i3.23692 · Serican journal of medicine · 2026-02-07

## TL;DR

Proper normalization methods are essential for improving the reproducibility of ChIP-seq experiments in tissue samples.

## Contribution

The study evaluates and compares four normalization methods for tissue ChIP-seq, emphasizing the importance of input-adjusted spike-in normalization.

## Key findings

- CPM normalization is useful for visualizing and comparing peak distribution and intensity across samples.
- Equal-read normalization improves both peak identification and intensity comparison.
- Input-adjusted spike-in normalization is crucial for accounting for differences in input chromatin amount in tissue ChIP-seq.

## Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) is a powerful technology for studying genetic and epigenetic regulation. However, ChIP-seq data can be heavily affected by variations in chromatin amount and composition, ChIP enrichment, library preparation, and sequencing depth, affecting its overall reproducibility across biological replicates. Here, we evaluated four ChIP-seq normalization methods utilizing triplicate Foxa1 ChIP-seq data performed in prostate cancer tissues from three mice. We found that count-per-million (CPM) normalization, although not affecting peak calling in individual samples, is very useful for visualization and comparison of peak distribution and intensity across samples. By contrast, equal-read normalization improves both peak identification and intensity comparison. Moreover, spike-in normalization took advantage of spike-in chromatin ChIP to correct technical variations in ChIP-seq, including ChIP enrichment, sample preparation, and sequencing. Lastly, input-adjusted spike-in normalization further accounts for differences in input chromatin amount across samples, which is especially crucial for tissue ChIP-seq that often starts with different amounts of input chromatin. Overall, our study demonstrated that appropriate normalization is essential to improve the reproducibility and comparability of ChIP-seq experiments and highlighted the importance of input-adjusted spike-in normalization for tissue ChIP-seq.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** FOXA1 (forkhead box A1) [NCBI Gene 3169]
- **Diseases:** prostate cancer (MONDO:0005159)
- **Species:** Mus musculus (taxon 10090)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** spk (spike) [NCBI Gene 5657015], Rep (Rab escort protein) [NCBI Gene 37246] {aka CG8432, Dmel\CG8432}, Drep3 (DNA fragmentation factor-related protein 3) [NCBI Gene 36292] {aka BcDNA:AT08574, CG13187, CG8364, DREP-3, Dmel\CG8364, Drep-3}, Rep2 (repair of chromatin damage 2) [NCBI Gene 110079] {aka Rep-2}, Foxa1 (forkhead box A1) [NCBI Gene 15375] {aka Hnf-3a, Hnf3a, Tcf-3a, Tcf3a}
- **Diseases:** prostate cancer (MESH:D011471), prostate tumors (MESH:D011472)
- **Chemicals:** NP40 (MESH:C010615), NaHCO3 (MESH:D017693), EDTA (MESH:D004492), DSG (MESH:C037258), SDS (MESH:D012967), formaldehyde (MESH:D005557), LiCl (MESH:D018021), agarose (MESH:D012685), deoxycholate (MESH:D003840), CPM (-), glycine (MESH:D005998)
- **Species:** Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly, species) [taxon 7227], Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090]
- **Mutations:** G9A

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12880172/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12880172/full.md

## References

11 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12880172/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12880172