# Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy: A multi-center retrospective analysis

## TL;DR

This study compares long-term results of minimally invasive and open kidney tumor removal surgeries, finding similar cancer control but better kidney function with the minimally invasive approach.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the long-term effectiveness of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy compared to open surgery.

## Key findings

- Oncological control is similar between MIPN and OPN.
- MIPN results in better renal preservation and fewer complications.
- MIPN is shown as a safe and effective long-term alternative to OPN.

## Abstract

Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) has become a preferred method over open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for treating localized
renal tumors. This multi-center retrospective study examines the long-term oncological and renal functional outcomes of MIPN compared to
OPN. Data from five tertiary centres were reviewed over a decade. Data indicates that while oncological control is similar for both
methods, MIPN provides superior renal preservation and fewer complications. Thus, we show MIPN as a safe and effective long-term
alternative to OPN.