# The Impact of Magnet Recognition on Nurse Managers’ Assessments of Work Environment, Quality, and Safety: A Cross‐Sectional Study

**Authors:** Hyunmin Yu, Luke J. Keele, Heather Brom, Helena Pittman, Roopa Varghese, Matthew D. McHugh, Linda H. Aiken

PMC · DOI: 10.1155/jonm/1847111 · Journal of Nursing Management · 2026-02-06

## TL;DR

This study finds that nurse managers in Magnet-recognized hospitals rate their work environment, care quality, and safety more positively than those in non-Magnet hospitals.

## Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence linking Magnet Recognition to improved nurse manager perceptions of hospital work environments and safety.

## Key findings

- Magnet hospital managers were 9 percentage points more likely to rate the work environment as excellent or good.
- Magnet hospital managers were 12 percentage points more likely to assign an excellent or good patient safety grade.
- Magnet hospital managers were 16 percentage points more likely to recommend their hospital to family and friends.

## Abstract

Nurse managers are central to hospital operations, yet little is known about how organizational factors, such as Magnet Recognition by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), shape their assessments of the work environment, care quality, and safety. This study examined whether Magnet status is associated with nurse managers’ assessments of these domains.

This cross‐sectional study used data from the 2024 Penn Nurses4All Survey, the 2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the ANCC’s list of Magnet‐recognized organizations. The sample included 1362 nurse managers from 771 hospitals across 10 U.S. states (450 in 186 Magnet hospitals and 912 in 585 non‐Magnet hospitals). Outcomes included managers’ assessments of the work environment, nursing care quality, patient safety, and hospital recommendation. Approximate balancing weights were applied to adjust for hospital‐ and manager‐level covariates, and weighted linear probability models estimated average treatment effects.

Magnet managers were more likely to hold graduate degrees and to work in large, teaching, and not‐for‐profit hospitals. Compared with non‐Magnet managers, they were 9 percentage points more likely to rate the work environment as excellent or good (b = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04–0.16) and to “definitely” recommend their hospital as a workplace (b = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02–0.16); 7 percentage points more likely to rate nursing care quality as excellent or good (b = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04–0.14); 12 percentage points more likely to assign an excellent or good patient safety grade (b = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06–0.19); and 16 percentage points more likely to recommend their hospital to family and friends (b = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.08–0.24).

Magnet status was associated with more favorable assessments of the work environment, quality, and safety among nurse managers. These findings suggest that Magnet structures may strengthen organizational environment and culture across multiple levels of the nursing workforce.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12877956/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12877956/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12877956/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12877956