PMC · DOI:10.1038/s41598-026-38434-6·February 5, 2026
Correction: Entanglement witnesses and separability criteria based on generalized equiangular tight frames
Katarzyna Siudzińska
Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Full text
Correction to:* Scientific Reports* 10.1038/s41598-025-13403-7, published online 14 August 2025
The original version of this Article contained errors.
Equation 79 was incorrectly given as:
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\begin{array}{c}{\Vert \mathcal{R}\Vert }_{\mathrm{tr}}=\sqrt{{\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}}^{A}-{\mathcal{C}}^{A}\left({\rho }^{A}\right)}\sqrt{{\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}}^{B}-{\mathcal{C}}^{B}\left({\rho }^{B}\right)}\end{array}$$\end{document}The correct Equation 79 appears below.
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\begin{array}{c}{\Vert \mathcal{R}\Vert }_{\mathrm{tr}}\le \sqrt{{\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}}^{A}-{\mathcal{C}}^{A}\left({\rho }^{A}\right)}\sqrt{{\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}}^{B}-{\mathcal{C}}^{B}\left({\rho }^{B}\right)}\end{array}$$\end{document}The original Article has been corrected.