# AI outperforms humans in establishing interpersonal closeness in emotionally engaging interactions, but only when labelled as human

**Authors:** Tobias Kleinert, Marie Waldschütz, Julian Blau, Markus Heinrichs, Bastian Schiller

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00391-7 · Communications Psychology · 2026-01-14

## TL;DR

People felt closer to AI than to humans during emotional chats if they thought the AI was human, but closeness dropped when they knew it was AI.

## Contribution

AI can foster greater emotional closeness than humans when perceived as human, revealing its potential and risks in social interactions.

## Key findings

- AI outperformed humans in building closeness when labelled as human in emotionally engaging interactions.
- Labelling AI as such reduced but did not eliminate relationship-building, likely due to lower participant engagement.
- Participants' closeness perceptions were enhanced by AI's higher levels of self-disclosure.

## Abstract

With the increasing accessibility of large language models to the public, questions arise about whether, and under what conditions, social-emotional interactions with artificial intelligence (AI) can lead to human-like relationship building. Across two double-blind randomised controlled studies with pre-registered analyses, 492 participants engaged in dyadic online interactions using a modified, text-based version of the ‘Fast Friends Procedure’ (a method designed to enable rapid relationship building), with pre-generated responses by either human partners or a minimally prompted large language model. When labelled as human, the AI outperformed human partners in establishing feelings of closeness during emotionally engaging ‘deep-talk’ interactions. This striking effect appears to stem from the AI’s higher levels of self-disclosure, which in turn enhanced participants’ perceptions of closeness. Labelling the partner as an AI reduced, but did not eliminate, relationship building, likely due to participants’ lower motivation to engage in interactions with an AI, reflected in both shorter responses and reduced feelings of closeness. These findings highlight AI’s potential to relieve overburdened social fields while underscoring the urgent need for ethical safeguards to prevent its misuse in fostering deceptive social connections.

Across two studies, people felt closer to AI than to humans after emotional chat interactions, but only if the AI was labelled as human. Labelling the partner as AI reduced, but did not prevent, relationship-building.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** psychiatric (MESH:D001523), LLM (MESH:D007806), AI (MESH:C538142), addiction (MESH:D019966), LIWC (MESH:D001037)
- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438), ICQ (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12876889/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12876889/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12876889/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12876889