# Should Clinical Ethicists Be Informed About Case Resolutions?

## TL;DR

The paper argues that clinical ethicists should be informed about case resolutions for better education, accountability, and emotional closure.

## Contribution

The paper presents a broader justification for informing ethicists about case resolutions beyond quality improvement.

## Key findings

- Informing ethicists about case resolutions supports ethics education and accountability.
- Transparency in case resolutions helps mitigate emotional uncertainty for ethicists.
- Confidentiality and administrative concerns should not prevent transparency efforts.

## Abstract

The question of whether clinical ethicists should be informed of case resolutions remains unresolved. While the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) recommends retrospective case reviews to assess whether recommendations were followed, it frames this practice solely as a quality improvement measure. While quality enhancement is a compelling rationale for ensuring that clinical ethicists are informed of the resolutions of consultations, it is not the sole justification for such transparency. Access to case resolutions strengthens ethics education, enhances accountability and transparency, facilitates contributions to the field and advocacy, and mitigates the emotional uncertainty that can arise when ethicists lack closure on complex cases. Although concerns about confidentiality and administrative constraints must be considered, they should not hinder efforts to foster a more transparent consultation process.