# Drivers of wolf depredation reporting and compensation use intentions by livestock producers

## TL;DR

This study explores why some livestock producers report wolf attacks and use compensation programs, finding that perceptions of others' actions and trust in authorities are key factors.

## Contribution

The study applies the Theory of Planned Behavior to identify social and psychological factors influencing depredation reporting and compensation use intentions.

## Key findings

- Perceptions of others' reporting behavior and risk of future attacks strongly predict reporting intentions.
- Trust in agencies, financial risk perception, and demographic factors influence compensation use intentions.
- Peer knowledge sharing and reducing financial vulnerability may improve program participation.

## Abstract

Across the western United States, compensation programs that pay livestock producers for losses seek to mitigate the impact of carnivore depredation on livestock. However, data suggest not all livestock producers report wolf depredations or utilize compensation programs. Understanding factors influencing producers to report depredations and to use compensation programs will be critical to program efficacy.

We designed a questionnaire expanding the Theory of Planned Behavior to explore which social-psychological and demographic factors most strongly correlate with compensation use and conflict reporting intentions. Our questionnaire was distributed across the inland western United States with confirmed wolf populations including Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Arizona, and New Mexico, as well as Alberta, Canada.

Perceptions of how commonly other producers were reporting wolf depredation (descriptive norms) and worry about future wolf depredation (perceptions of risk probability) were the strongest predictors of reporting intention. A lack of trust in state agencies, perceived financial risk without access to depredation compensation, descriptive norms, attitudes, age, and producer state of residence were the strongest predictors of compensation use intention. Our findings suggest that reducing operational financial vulnerability, building trust in agency personnel, and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing may be effective strategies for increasing reporting and compensation use. Though our sample size was relatively small, our results are informative and have important implications for compensation programs and reporting.