# Pharmacokinetic Comparability of ABP 654, a Biosimilar to Ustekinumab, Administered Either via Prefilled Syringe or Autoinjector in Healthy Adults: Results from a Randomized, Open‐Label, Parallel‐Group Study

**Authors:** Vincent Chow, Peter J. Winkle, Daniel T. Mytych, Jia Cao, Carolina Barragan, Alexander Colbert, Shalini Gupta, Waldemar Radziszewski, Janet Franklin

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70031 · Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development · 2026-02-05

## TL;DR

This study shows that ABP 654, a biosimilar to ustekinumab, has similar pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity when administered via prefilled syringe or autoinjector in healthy adults.

## Contribution

Demonstrates the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence and comparable safety of two delivery methods for ABP 654.

## Key findings

- PK bioequivalence was confirmed between the prefilled syringe and autoinjector groups.
- Adverse events and antidrug antibody incidence were similar between the two administration methods.
- Results support the interchangeable use of the two delivery devices for ABP 654.

## Abstract

ABP 654, a biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product, is available in a prefilled syringe (PFS) for subcutaneous (SC) use. The ABP 654 autoinjector pen (AIP) has recently been developed with an aim to improve the injection experience for patients and caregivers. This study was designed to assess the similarity of pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of a 90‐mg SC injection of ABP 654 administered via PFS or AIP in healthy volunteers. A total of 156 adults were randomized at a ratio of 1:1. PK bioequivalence was established between the PFS and AIP groups based on the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary PK endpoints of maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) being contained within the prespecified margin of 0.8 to 1.25. The frequency, type, and severity of adverse events as well as the incidence of antidrug antibodies were similar between the PFS and AIP groups. Overall, the results support a conclusion of PK bioequivalency as well as comparable safety and immunogenicity of ABP 654 administered via PFS and AIP.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** AIP (AHR interacting HSP90 co-chaperone) [NCBI Gene 9049] {aka ARA9, FKBP16, FKBP37, PITA1, SMTPHN, XAP-2}
- **Diseases:** sepsis (MESH:D018805), appendicitis (MESH:D001064), inflammatory conditions (MESH:D007249), RP (MESH:D053591), Headache (MESH:D006261), plaque psoriasis (MESH:D011565), tibia-fibula fracture (MESH:D000092504), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), ADA (MESH:C531816)
- **Chemicals:** ABP 654 (-), ABP (MESH:C072526), STELARA (MESH:D000069549), L-histidine (MESH:D006639), sucrose (MESH:D013395), polysorbate 80 (MESH:D011136)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12875155/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12875155/full.md

## References

24 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12875155/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12875155