# Prefrontal TDCS does not improve working memory performance in individuals with chronic alcohol and tobacco use

**Authors:** Franziska Göttgens, Ute Habel, Paul Wallheinke, Julie A. Blendy, Carmen Weidler

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2026.01.011 · IBRO Neuroscience Reports · 2026-01-21

## TL;DR

This study found that stimulating the right prefrontal cortex with tDCS did not improve working memory in people with alcohol and tobacco use.

## Contribution

The study provides evidence that right DLPFC tDCS does not reliably enhance working memory in individuals with chronic alcohol and tobacco use.

## Key findings

- Anodal tDCS targeting the right DLPFC did not improve working memory performance in alcohol-dependent patients, tobacco users, or healthy controls.
- Bayesian analysis supported the lack of significant effects from tDCS stimulation.
- The results suggest the right DLPFC may not be an optimal target for tDCS in clinical working memory enhancement.

## Abstract

Working memory (WM) deficits are common in psychiatric disorders that are associated with decreased prefrontal cortex activity. As WM is essential for cognitive functions, deficits interfere with daily life and treatment. The lateralization of WM components remains unclear, but stimuli matching, often assessed using the n-back task, has been associated with right-hemispheric dominance. This study examines whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) could enhance WM performance in alcohol-dependent patients (AD), tobacco users (TU) and healthy controls (HC). In a double-blind, sham-controlled study, tDCS was applied to upregulate right DLPFC activity. A total of 46 participants received anodal tDCS with a current intensity of 1.5 mA for 20 min or sham stimulation. In addition to the 7x5cm anode, a large reference electrode (10x10cm) was situated over the contralateral supraorbital area. While being stimulated, participants performed the n-back task as a measure of WM performance. Results revealed no significant differences in WM performance between active and sham stimulated participants, nor between groups, and no significant interaction between stimulation condition and group. Bayesian analysis supported the null effects. These findings do not provide evidence that single-session right DLPFC stimulation reliably enhances working memory across all stimulus types. The outcomes may have been influenced by task–stimulation mismatch, sample heterogeneity, small sample size, and stimulation parameters, which could limit the ability to detect subtle tDCS effects in both clinical and healthy populations.

•WM deficits in psychiatric disorders impair PFC function and hinder treatment.•Stimulus-matching in n-back tasks is predominantly mediated by the right DLPFC.•Chronic nicotine consumption modulates tDCS effects on cognition and working memory.•Right DLPFC tDCS fails to enhance WM in alcohol-dependent patients and smokers.•Right DLPFC may not be an optimal tDCS target for clinical WM enhancement.

WM deficits in psychiatric disorders impair PFC function and hinder treatment.

Stimulus-matching in n-back tasks is predominantly mediated by the right DLPFC.

Chronic nicotine consumption modulates tDCS effects on cognition and working memory.

Right DLPFC tDCS fails to enhance WM in alcohol-dependent patients and smokers.

Right DLPFC may not be an optimal tDCS target for clinical WM enhancement.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** alcohol dependence (MONDO:0002046)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Working memory (WM) deficits (MESH:D008569), psychiatric disorders (MESH:D001523)
- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Nicotiana tabacum (American tobacco, species) [taxon 4097]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12874797/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12874797/full.md

## References

68 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12874797/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12874797