Bayesian workflow for bias-adjustment model in meta-analysis
Juyoung Jung, Ariel M. Aloe
TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian workflow to improve the robustness of bias-adjustment models in meta-analysis, showing how prior choices affect results and model reliability.
Contribution
A systematic Bayesian workflow is proposed to evaluate and apply bias-adjustment models in meta-analysis with greater transparency and robustness.
Findings
Results are highly sensitive to the prior on bias probability in the Bayesian workflow.
The random-effects model showed better predictive accuracy than the bias-adjustment model.
The bias-adjustment model produced wider credible intervals, reflecting greater uncertainty.
Abstract
Bayesian hierarchical models offer a principled framework for adjusting for study-level bias in meta-analysis, but their complexity and sensitivity to prior specifications necessitate a systematic framework for robust application. This study demonstrates the application of a Bayesian workflow to this challenge, comparing a standard random-effects model to a bias-adjustment model across a real-world dataset and a targeted simulation study. The workflow revealed a high sensitivity of results to the prior on bias probability, showing that while the simpler random-effects model had superior predictive accuracy as measured by the widely applicable information criterion, the bias-adjustment model successfully propagated uncertainty by producing wider, more conservative credible intervals. The simulation confirmed the model’s ability to recover true parameters when priors were well-specified.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews · Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference