# Induction strategies for preventing hemodynamic changes after intubation in non-cardiac surgery patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

**Authors:** Yunfan Gan, Xiaoling Yang, Weiliao Wang, Han Zhang, Xian Luo, Maohua Wang, Zhaojin Xu, Song Su, Jiali Wu

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1694700 · 2026-01-22

## TL;DR

This study compares drug combinations to reduce blood pressure and heart rate changes after intubation in non-cardiac surgery patients.

## Contribution

A network meta-analysis identifies optimal drug combinations for suppressing hemodynamic fluctuations after intubation.

## Key findings

- Oxycodone-Propofol-Lidocaine best controls MAP fluctuations after intubation.
- Fentanyl-Propofol-Dexmedetomidine is most effective for controlling HR fluctuations.
- More trials are needed to confirm results and determine optimal dosing.

## Abstract

Tracheal intubation and laryngoscopy during general anesthesia induce significant hemodynamic changes. Although generally transient, these physiological perturbations may precipitate critical cardiovascular events in high-risk populations. Anesthesiologists have used various drug combinations to suppress this response. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to identify a drug combination that can better suppress hemodynamic fluctuations caused by tracheal intubation in non-cardiac surgical patients.

We searched 3 different medical literature databases. A NMA was performed on the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RCTs were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A random effects network meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework. The effects of each pharmacological strategy on intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery were compared. Endpoints included ΔMean Arterial Pressure (ΔMAP) and ΔHeart Rate (ΔHR).

The network meta-analysis included 10 studies and 791 patients. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, Oxycodone-Propofol-Lidocaine (87.4%) demonstrated superior efficacy in controlling fluctuations in MAP, followed by Fentanyl-Propofol-Dexmedetomidine (82.9%) and Fentanyl-Propofol-Clonidine (81.6%). Fen-Pro-Dex (94.8%) demonstrated superior efficacy in controlling fluctuations in HR, followed by Fentanyl-Propofol-Lidocaine (Epidural) (83.3%), Fentanyl-Propofol-Remifentanil (79.1%).

Among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, Oxy-Pro-Lid was preferred for attenuating post-intubation changes in MAP, whereas Fen-Pro-Dex provided superior control of HR fluctuations. These findings may help guide the selection of induction pharmacological strategies, although more randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results and clarify optimal dosing.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024591333, identifier CRD42024591333.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** Oxycodone (PubChem CID 5284603), Propofol (PubChem CID 4943), Lidocaine (PubChem CID 3676), Fentanyl (PubChem CID 3345), Dexmedetomidine (PubChem CID 5311068), Clonidine (PubChem CID 2803), Remifentanil (PubChem CID 60815)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Remifentanil (MESH:D000077208), Clonidine (MESH:D003000), Propofol (MESH:D015742), Lidocaine (MESH:D008012), Fentanyl (MESH:D005283), Dex (MESH:D003915), Oxycodone (MESH:D010098), Fen-Pro (-), Dexmedetomidine (MESH:D020927)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12872843/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12872843