Editorial Practices of African Journals: A Qualitative Analysis from Kenya, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Mozambique

TL;DR

This study examines editorial practices in African journals from Kenya, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Mozambique to understand challenges and opportunities for improving their visibility and credibility.

Contribution

The study provides a qualitative analysis of editorial practices and factors affecting African journals, highlighting structural and cultural barriers.

Findings

African journals struggle with adherence to international editorial standards like peer review and transparency.

Financial and technological constraints hinder editorial integrity and journal credibility.

Perceptions of African journals as inferior are linked to historical neglect and mismanagement.

Abstract

Information on journal visibility helps researchers decide where to publish. Some quality indicators used are directly associated with the journal’s editorial practices. By understanding the barriers, challenges, and opportunities, this study aims to explore existing editorial practices among African journals, explore the underlying factors affecting the editorial practices of African journals, and understand the views and preferences of authors regarding the choice of journals for publication.

This study triangulated the sources of information and qualitative design data-gathering techniques to allow for nuances and deeper insights into the performance and visibility of African Journals. We conducted In-depth Interviews (IDIs), Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) in Kenya, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Mozambique. The study population comprised journal editors-in-chief, representatives from African-wide journal databases/indexers, institutional repository representatives, and authors. A purposive sampling technique was used to identify participants. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant bodies. Qualitative data from the audio-recorded interviews were transcribed using MS Word and exported to NVivo software for analysis.

The key structural issues on editorial practices among African journals established by the study included adherence to internationally accepted editorial practices on peer review decision-making and challenges in implementing measures of transparency and rigor. Some of the underlying factors affecting African journal editorial practices that were highlighted included financial constraints, challenges in peer review, challenges in maintaining editorial integrity, and challenges in technological and digital infrastructure. African journals also face challenges of credibility and trustworthiness among authors. Participants outlined how the longstanding neglect of African journals and lack of funding have created cultures of editorial mismanagement, publishing inconsistency, and other logistical issues, all of which contribute to perceptions of African journals as inferior to Northern ones.