# Effect of the screw-retained abutment material on the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate restorations

**Authors:** Eduarda de Miranda Bohrer, Pablo Machado Soares, Maria Gabriela Packaeser, Lucas Saldanha da Rosa, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan, Luiz Felipe Valandro, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira

PMC · DOI: 10.1590/0103-644020256936 · 2026-02-02

## TL;DR

This study found that zirconia abutments improve the durability of lithium disilicate dental restorations under stress compared to other materials.

## Contribution

The study introduces a comparison of abutment materials' effects on lithium disilicate restorations under fatigue conditions.

## Key findings

- Zirconia abutments showed the highest fatigue failure load compared to other materials.
- PEEK abutments had the lowest fatigue failure load, indicating poorer performance.
- SEM and finite element analyses confirmed the influence of abutment material on stress distribution.

## Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the screw-retained abutment material (zirconia (Yz), lithium disilicate (Ld), Polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Picn), and Polietheretherketone (Peek)) on the fatigue behavior and stress distribution of lithium disilicate restorative material. Ld discs (Ø= 10 mm; thickness = 1 mm) were obtained and allocated into four groups according to the abutment material factor: Yz, Ld, Picn, and Peek (Ø= 10mm; thickness 3 mm). A screw access hole was made at the center of each abutment and filled with resin composite (thickness = 2 mm). The materials were adhesively bonded and tested under monotonic mechanical load (n= 3) and cyclic fatigue (n= 15; initial load: 200 N for 10,000 cycles; step size: 100 N/10,000 cycles; frequency: 20 Hz) until failure. Finite element and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analyses were also performed. The obtained data were analyzed by 1-Way ANOVA for monotonic (α=0.05) and Kaplan Meier and log-rank post-hoc for fatigue data tests. All groups presented a decrease in the fatigue failure load (FFL) when compared to the monotonic test. The abutment material affected the lithium disilicate restoration performance (p=.048; F= 4.134), since zirconia showed the highest FFL (p<.05), followed by Picn and Ld, which were similar to each other (p>.05). The lowest values of FFL were found for Peek (p<.05). The screw-retained abutment material influences the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate restorations, being zirconia the most indicated material to enhance mechanical performance.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** lithium disilicate (PubChem CID 101943115), zirconia (PubChem CID 6452892)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fatigue (MESH:D005221)
- **Chemicals:** zirconia (MESH:C028541)

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12872105/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12872105