# Investigating the effect of augmented reality-based virtual patient training on occupational therapy students’ clinical decision-making: A quasi-experimental study

**Authors:** Farshid Chahartangi, Nahid Zarifsanaiey, Manoosh Mehrabi, Bahareh Zeynalzadeh Ghoochani, Nahid Sharifzadeh

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340759 · 2026-02-04

## TL;DR

This study shows that using augmented reality-based virtual patients improves clinical decision-making skills in occupational therapy students.

## Contribution

The study introduces and evaluates an augmented reality-based virtual patient model for occupational therapy education.

## Key findings

- The intervention group showed a 7.34 times higher probability of correct responses post-test compared to pre-test.
- The intervention group had a 3.75 times higher likelihood of correct responses than the control group.
- The VPAR model is effective in enhancing clinical decision-making skills in occupational therapy students.

## Abstract

Technology-enhanced education is an essential element of modern universities, improving clinical decision-making, and student performance. This study aimed to design and evaluate an augmented reality-based virtual patient (VPAR) educational model to enhance clinical decision-making in upper limb nerves among occupational therapy students. This quasi-experimental study conducted from January to April 2025 with 44 occupational therapy students from Shiraz and Arak Universities of Medical Sciences. Classes were assigned by pre-existing cluster allocation to the intervention group (VPAR, n = 24) or the control group (traditional education, n = 20). Clinical decision-making skills were assessed before and one month after a three-week VPAR program using a researcher-developed questionnaire. Data were analyzed using R software (version 4.3.3) and the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) model to determine the effect of the intervention. The post-test probability of a correct response was 7.34 times greater than the pre-test (p = 0.0684), indicating improved performance likely due to the intervention (p = 0.0018). Additionally, the intervention group had a 3.75 times higher likelihood of correct responses compared to the control group (p = 0.0004), demonstrating the intervention’s positive impact. In conclusion, the VPAR is an effective tool for enhancing clinical decision-making among occupational therapy students.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** , Median, or Ulnar nerve injury (MESH:C563598), median nerve injury (MESH:D020423), neurological injury (MESH:D020196), injuries (MESH:D014947), Physical Disabilities (MESH:D059445), heart failure (MESH:D006333), upper limb nerve lesions (MESH:D038062), , and Ulnar nerve injuries (MESH:D020424), Limb Nerve Injury (MESH:D000080902), lesions (MESH:D009059)
- **Chemicals:** VPAR (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12872011/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12872011