# Developing the Patient Experience Assessment Questionnaire for Hospital Inpatient Care in South Korea

**Authors:** Yeongchae Song, Jung‐Eun Kim, Bon Mi Koo, Young‐Geun Choi, Un‐Na Kim, Jin Yong Lee, Min‐Woo Jo, Minsu Ock, Young Kyung Do

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/hex.70560 · Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy · 2026-02-03

## TL;DR

This paper describes the development of a patient experience questionnaire for hospital inpatient care in South Korea, tailored to local healthcare needs and validated for reliability and validity.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a locally developed and validated patient experience assessment tool for South Korea's healthcare system.

## Key findings

- The PXA questionnaire includes 21 items across six domains, validated through EFA and CFA.
- The questionnaire demonstrated high convergent validity and strong model fit in psychometric testing.
- Patient and caregiver input was critical in identifying culturally specific dimensions of care.

## Abstract

Measuring patient experiences has become a key initiative for improving healthcare quality worldwide. Since patient experiences are inherently shaped by sociocultural context and healthcare system structures, developing locally relevant measurement tools is crucial for reflecting patients' needs and expectations. South Korea has developed a patient experience questionnaire for hospital inpatient care within its National Health Insurance system through a systematic process involving patient engagement. In outlining the development process of the questionnaire, this study assesses its psychometric properties, focusing on validity and reliability.

The Patient Experience Assessment (PXA) questionnaire was developed through a three‐phase process: (1) item generation via a literature review and qualitative research with patient and caregiver groups, (2) expert review using the Delphi method, and (3) validity and reliability testing through a pilot test. After stakeholder feedback, the current version of PXA includes 21 items across 6 domains. Psychometric properties were assessed using data from 629 inpatients in four general hospitals, split into two subsamples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to ensure robust construct validation. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha.

The PXA questionnaire includes globally recognised patient‐centred themes while addressing unique issues that matter to patients in the Korean healthcare system. EFA identified a four‐factor structure: (1) Information, dignity, and autonomy; (2) Communication with nurses; (3) Communication with doctors; and (4) Hospital environment. CFA confirmed this structure, demonstrating high convergent validity (standardised loadings > 0.70) and satisfactory model fit (CFI and TLI > 0.950, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.046). The instrument showed excellent reliability (Cronbach's alpha: total = 0.95; subscales = 0.89–0.93).

The PXA questionnaire, currently being implemented in South Korea, demonstrates robust psychometric properties. This work also exemplifies the process of developing a locally relevant patient experience questionnaire, grounded in global knowledge on patient‐centred care.

Patients and caregivers participated in focus group discussions during PXA development. Their opinions directly informed the identification of culturally specific patient experience dimensions relevant to the Korean healthcare system. These findings emphasise engaging target patient populations in developing locally relevant patient experience instruments.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CFI (complement factor I) [NCBI Gene 3426] {aka AHUS3, ARMD13, C3BINA, C3b-INA, FI, IF}
- **Diseases:** PXA (MESH:D003643), SRMR (MESH:D018365), pain (MESH:D010146), HIRA (OMIM:603663)
- **Chemicals:** EFA (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868926/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868926/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868926/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868926