# Predicting health-related quality of life for patients with gastroesophageal cancer

**Authors:** Steven C. Kuijper, Irene Cara, Gijs Geleijnse, Marije Slingerland, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Bastiaan R. Klarenbeek, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven, Richard van Hillegersberg, Rob H. A. Verhoeven, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s11136-025-04097-5 · Quality of Life Research · 2026-02-03

## TL;DR

This study developed models to predict quality of life changes in gastroesophageal cancer patients after treatment, helping doctors and patients make better decisions.

## Contribution

A new sequential score model using XGBoost was proposed and validated alongside existing risk-prediction models for HRQoL forecasting.

## Key findings

- Risk-prediction models showed strong performance with AUC scores between 0.79 and 0.87 for predicting HRQoL deterioration.
- Sequential score models explained up to 40% of the variance in HRQoL scores using XGBoost regression.
- Both models demonstrated good calibration and potential for clinical use in predicting patient outcomes.

## Abstract

Gastroesophageal cancer has a poor prognosis, and treatment significantly impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Accurate prediction of HRQoL changes after treatment can support shared decision-making. This study aimed to develop and validate HRQoL prediction models for patients with gastroesophageal cancer using established risk-prediction models and a newly proposed sequential score model.

HRQoL data came from the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Esophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients registry, linked to the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning scales were used as outcomes. Risk-prediction models, based on logistic elastic-net regression, estimated the probability of meaningful HRQoL deterioration at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The sequential score model, using XGBoost regression, predicted the next HRQoL score at any time. Calibration curves and integrated calibration index (ICI) assessed predictive performance, with Brier scores and AUC for risk-prediction models and root mean squared error plus Out-of-Sample r² for sequential models.

Risk-prediction models showed strong performance (ICI: 0.03–0.08; Brier score: 0.09–0.17; AUC: 0.79–0.87) for predicting significant deterioration in Summary Score, Physical Functioning, and Fatigue, with good calibration. Sequential score models explained up to 40% of the variance in HRQoL scores.

Both models effectively predicted HRQoL in gastroesophageal cancer patients, demonstrating potential to enhance patient care and information sharing through accurate prediction of HRQoL outcomes.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-025-04097-5.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** gastroesophageal cancer (MONDO:0850129)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** ALB (albumin) [NCBI Gene 213] {aka FDAHT, HSA, PRO0883, PRO0903, PRO1341}
- **Diseases:** Nausea-vomiting (MESH:D020250), Cancer (MESH:D009369), Gastroesophageal junction (MESH:D008309), Fatigue (MESH:D005221), Esophageal-Gastric Cancer (MESH:D013274), dyspnea (MESH:D004417), Appetite loss (MESH:D001068), vomiting (MESH:D014839), financial difficulties (MESH:D051346), GHS (MESH:D013226), colorectal cancer (MESH:D015179), cardia tumors (MESH:D004938), pain (MESH:D010146), diarrhea (MESH:D003967), breast cancer (MESH:D001943), Anxiety and Depression (MESH:D001007), Insomnia (MESH:D007319), hair loss (MESH:D000505), nausea (MESH:D009325), Constipation (MESH:D003248), cervical cancer (MESH:D002583)
- **Chemicals:** creatinine (MESH:D003404), alcohol (MESH:D000438)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868049/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868049/full.md

## References

5 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868049/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12868049