# Investigating the association between urban rural classification with fragility fractures and bone density in the UK: evidence from a large observational clinical cohort

**Authors:** Hamzah Amin, Muhammed Aqib Khan, Marwan Bukhari

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkag004 · Rheumatology Advances in Practice · 2026-01-08

## TL;DR

This study examines how living in urban or rural areas in the UK affects bone health and fracture risk, finding rural residence linked to better bone density but not lower fracture rates.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is identifying rural residence as associated with improved bone density and body composition in a UK clinical cohort.

## Key findings

- Rural residence was associated with lower osteoporosis odds at femoral neck and lumbar spine.
- Rural patients had significantly lower regional body fat percentages compared to urban residents.
- No significant association was found between rural/urban status and fragility fracture odds.

## Abstract

Geographic variation in fracture risk exists across the UK, yet rural/urban differences in fracture risk and bone density have yet to be explored. We aimed to investigate associations between rural urban classification (RUC) and bone health outcomes in a UK clinical population.

We analysed patients who underwent DXA scanning between June 2004 and May 2025 in northwest England. Geographic status was assessed using the 2011 UK Census RUC. Multiple imputation with parameter pooling was performed with logistic and linear regression models adjusted for Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) risk factors to investigate the associations between urban and rural residence and major osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, bone mineral density and body composition.

Of 40 951 eligible patients, 32 324 (79%) were women with a mean age of 68.2 years; 11 811 major osteoporotic fractures were reported including 2208 hip fractures. No significant association existed between rural/urban status and odds of having a previous fragility fracture [major osteoporotic fractures: odds ratio (OR) 0.97 (95% CI 0.92, 1.02); hip fractures: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90, 1.07)]. Rural residence was associated with lower osteoporosis odds [femoral neck OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.80, 0.92); lumbar spine OR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80, 0.91)]. Rural patients had significantly lower regional body fat [femoral fat percentage: β = −0.45 (95% CI −0.55, −0.34), P < 0.001; abdominal fat percentage: β = −0.43 (95% CI −0.58, −0.29), P < 0.001].

Rural residence was associated with improved bone density and body composition but was not associated with fragility fractures in our referred UK clinical cohort.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** osteoporosis (MONDO:0005298)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** hip fractures (MESH:D006620), osteoporosis (MESH:D010024), osteoporotic fractures (MESH:D058866), Fracture (MESH:D050723), fragility fracture (MESH:D005600)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12867579/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12867579/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12867579