# FRET score: predictors of futile recanalisation following endovascular thrombectomy—a multicentre cohort study from the EVATRISP collaboration

**Authors:** Yoel Schwartzmann, Mirjam R Heldner, Hamza Jubran, Marcel Arnold, Philipe S Breiding, Fatma Shalabi, Tamer Jubeh, Issa Metanis, Annika Nordanstig, Paul J Nederkoorn, Nabila Wali, Anne van der Meij, Susanne Wegener, Lukas Otto, Hannah Lea Handelsmann, Patrik Michel, Davide Strambo, Alexander Salerno, Gian Marco De Marchis, Tolga Dittrich, Sami Curtze, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Henrik Gensicke, Stefan Engelter, Valerian Altersberger, Simon Trüssel, Christian H Nolte, Christoph Riegler, Andrea Zini, Federica Naldi, Guido Bigliardi, Livio Picchetto, Joao Pedro Marto, José Pedro Costa, Jeremy Molad, Hen Hallevi, Carlo W Cereda, Alessandro Pezzini, Mauro Magoni, Visnja Padjen, Marialuisa Zedde, Ronen R Leker

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/esj/aakaf013 · European Stroke Journal · 2026-01-01

## TL;DR

This study developed the FRET score to predict which stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy will not benefit functionally despite successful treatment.

## Contribution

The FRET score is a novel predictive tool for identifying patients at high risk of futile recanalisation after endovascular thrombectomy.

## Key findings

- The FRET score includes predictors like age, diabetes, and NIHSS with good discrimination (AUC 0.721).
- Patients with FRET ≥ 3 are at high risk for futile recanalisation.
- Validation confirmed similar performance (AUC 0.708) in an independent cohort.

## Abstract

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the treatment of choice for LVO stroke, yet nearly half of successfully recanalised patients fail to achieve functional independence, a phenomenon termed futile recanalisation (FR). Predictors of FR remain poorly defined in large, heterogeneous populations. Therefore, we aimed to develop a predictive score for FR.

Endovascular thrombectomy-treated LVO patients from the prospective, multicentre EVATRISP collaboration were included. All patients had known pre-stroke functional status, modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score and 90-day mRS. Futile recanalisation was defined as mRS > 2 at 90 days despite mTICI ≥ 2b. Patients with FR were compared to those with successful recanalisation and mRS ≤ 2. The cohort was randomly split into derivation (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors that were used to construct the futile recanalisation following endovascular thrombectomy (FRET) score.

Of 9909 patients, 7272 (73%) achieved successful recanalisation and 3420 (47%) of them experienced FR. In the derivation set, FR was independently associated with older age, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, higher NIHSS, anterior cerebral artery occlusion, seizures at presentation, non-use of intravenous thrombolysis and lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) or posterior circulation ASPECTS. Futile recanalisation patients had longer hospital stays and higher mortality rates. The FRET score demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.721; 95% CI, 0.702–0.740), with FRET ≥ 3 indicating high risk. The validation cohort yielded similar performance (AUC 0.708; 95% CI, 0.680–0.737).

The FRET score enables early identification of EVT patients at high risk for FR.

Graphical Abstract

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** stroke (MONDO:0005098), diabetes (MONDO:0005015), ischaemic heart disease (MONDO:0024644)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ischaemic heart disease (MESH:D006331), anterior cerebral artery occlusion (MESH:D020243), diabetes (MESH:D003920), seizures (MESH:D012640), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (MESH:D002544), Stroke (MESH:D020521)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866636/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866636/full.md

## References

35 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866636/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866636