# Focused cardiac ultrasound conducted by neurologists in patients with stroke: A validation study

**Authors:** Jorge Pagola, Piergiorgio Lochner, Radim Licenik, Giulio Maria Fiore, Felipe A Montellano, Victor Gonzalez, Valérie Pavlicek, Juan Alvarez-Cienfuegos, Sergio Moral, Roberto Muñoz Arrondo, Alberto Vera, Angel Ruiz, Jesús González Mirelis, Jorge Rodríguez-Pardo, Esther Pérez-David, Juan Manuel García-Sánchez, Lara Ruiz Gómez, Laura Amaya Pascasio, Elvira Carrión Ríos, Tania Rodriguez-Ares, Charigan Abou, María Payá, Laura Guerra, Ana de Arce, Ainhoa Benegas Arostegui, Muhammad Khaled Hasan, Vlatka Reskovic

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/esj/23969873251345374 · European Stroke Journal · 2026-01-01

## TL;DR

Neurologists can reliably perform focused cardiac ultrasound to detect heart issues linked to stroke, with accuracy comparable to cardiologists.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that trained neurologists can perform FoCUS with high accuracy for stroke-related cardiac assessments.

## Key findings

- Neurologists showed no significant differences from cardiologists in detecting key cardiac abnormalities.
- Neurologists achieved over 90% accuracy in identifying cardioembolic sources.
- Training neurologists in FoCUS can improve stroke diagnostics and management.

## Abstract

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has a high diagnostic yield and a rapid theoretical learning curve. FoCUS can be applied in stroke assessments performed by stroke neurologists when a cardioembolic stroke is suspected.

An international multicenter, prospective validation study was conducted to assess neurologists’ ability to perform FoCUS. The FoCUS examination was defined as a simplified 2D transthoracic echocardiography. Neurologists and cardiologists performed the FoCUS independently and blinded. A twenty-question test evaluated neurologists’ ability to recognize sources of cardioembolic stroke from recorded FoCUS studies.

A total of 432 paired studies involving 216 patients were conducted across 11 centers. No significant differences were found between neurologists and cardiologists in detecting: Left Ventricle (LV) dysfunction (7.4% vs 7.9%, p = 0.834), LV dilation (2.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.766), VC collapsibility (7.2% vs 9.1%, p = 0.501), Right Ventricle dysfunction (0.9% vs 0.9%, p = 0.999), and pericardial effusion (0.5% vs 1.9%, p = 0.212). Cohen Kappa showed substantial agreement for LV dysfunction (0.640), moderate for LV dilation (0.589), and fair for VC collapsibility (0.226). Neurologists demonstrated 93.82% sensitivity and 92.92% specificity for detecting embolic sources. Success rate for LV akinesia was 88% (16/18), LV dysfunction 83% (15/18), complex aortic plaque 88% (16/18), and mitral stenosis 55% (10/18).

Properly trained neurologists can reliably perform FoCUS, particularly for assessing LV function and dilation, with better results in patients with favorable echocardiographic windows. While VC assessment requires further training, neurologists demonstrated high accuracy in identifying cardioembolic sources (over 90% of cases correctly identified). This study supports implementing standardized FoCUS training for neurologists through collaboration with cardiology specialists to enhance stroke diagnostics and management.

Graphical abstract

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** stroke (MONDO:0005098)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cardioembolic stroke (MESH:D000083262), aortic plaque (MESH:D003773), Right Ventricle dysfunction (MESH:C535682), dilation (MESH:D002311), mitral stenosis (MESH:D008946), LV akinesia (MESH:D020257), pericardial effusion (MESH:D010490), stroke (MESH:D020521), VC collapsibility (MESH:D001261)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866232/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866232/full.md

## References

25 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866232/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12866232