# Age‐Specific Survival Estimation of a Eurasian Crane Population Highlights a Long‐Term Decline in Juvenile Survival

**Authors:** Morgane Gicquel, Juan C. Alonso, Lovisa Nilsson, Matthew Low, Javier A. Alonso, Dmitrijs Boiko, Damon Bridge, Patrick Dulau, Thomas Heinicke, Anne Kettner, Yosef Kiat, Petras Kurlavičius, Sigvard Lundgren, Michael Modrow, Günter Nowald, Ivar Ojaste, Alain Salvi, Jostein Sandvik, Markéta Ticháčková, Antonio Torrijo, Jari Valkama, Zsolt Végvári, Johan Månsson

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/ece3.72779 · Ecology and Evolution · 2026-02-03

## TL;DR

Juvenile survival rates of Eurasian cranes have dropped by 30% over 37 years, likely due to environmental pressures like habitat loss and climate change.

## Contribution

This study provides the first long-term analysis of age-specific survival trends in Eurasian cranes, revealing a significant decline in juvenile survival.

## Key findings

- Juvenile survival declined by nearly 30% over 37 years.
- Sub-adult survival decreased slightly, while adult survival remained stable.
- Environmental factors like habitat degradation and climate change are likely driving juvenile survival declines.

## Abstract

The Eurasian crane (
Grus grus
), a symbol of conservation success in Europe, has made an impressive recovery since the 1979 Birds Directive, with current estimates reaching around 590,000 individuals. However, this transition from vulnerability to abundance brings new challenges, particularly arising from interactions with human activities (e.g., conflicts with agriculture). Understanding the future dynamics of crane populations requires knowledge of demographic parameters that are crucial for predicting population trends and informing management and conservation measures. We analysed 37 years of data (1985–2021) from 5049 juvenile‐banded cranes and 172,725 resightings, providing estimates of survival rates across age classes and over time. Our findings indicate that juveniles exhibit the lowest survival rates, while sub‐adults have higher survival, and adults show a decrease in their survival probability with age, as expected with the senescence process. Over the study period, juvenile survival declined by almost 30% overall, while sub‐adults experienced a smaller decrease, and adults showed no change. Life expectancy at birth was 10 years, and maximum lifespan reached 25 years. We found no difference in the survival estimates of males and females. The decline in juvenile survival over the years highlights the growing challenges likely driven by habitat degradation, climate change, agricultural practices, and increasing population densities. These findings align with previous research on crane survival and underscore the importance of understanding age‐specific survival dynamics in response to environmental changes. This study highlights the challenges facing Eurasian crane populations, where further declines in juvenile and immature survival rates could lead to population declines unless compensated by a stable or higher adult survival. Effective conservation strategies will require further research into reproductive success and details on age‐specific mortality causes and environmental pressures, although targeted interventions can already be implemented to mitigate current impacts of habitat degradation and climate change.

The Eurasian crane (Grus grus), a symbol of conservation success in Europe, has made an impressive recovery. However, our results show that over the study period, juvenile survival declined by almost 30% overall, while sub‐adults experienced a smaller decrease, and adults showed no change. The decline in juvenile survival over the years highlights increasing challenges likely driven by habitat degradation, climate change, agricultural practices, and rising population densities.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Grus grus (taxon 40816)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Grus grus (Eurasian crane, species) [taxon 40816], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12865728/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12865728/full.md

## References

101 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12865728/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12865728