Correction: Effect of multiple calcination cycles on CO2 capture efficiency during carbonation of MgO in a mineral looping process
Elena Tajuelo Rodriguez, Lawrence M. Anovitz, Sai Adapa, Ke Yuan, Dale Hensley, Dong Youn Chung, Matthew G. Boebinger, Andrew G. Stack, Juliane Weber
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-025-23708-2, published online 10 November 2025
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Figure legends of Figure 10, 11 and 12. The legends of these Figures were inadvertently switched.
The legend of Figure 10:
“MgO nanopowder characterization prior to experiments using microscopy. (a) Bright Field Transmission Electron Microscopy (BF-TEM) image of AA, (b) Secondary electron scanning electron microscopy (SE-SEM) image of AA. (c) BF-TEM image of BTC, (d) SE-SEM image of BTC, (e) BF-TEM image of SS, (f) SE-SEM image of SS.”
now reads:
“Weight percent nesquehonite (%) as a function of surface area (m^2^/g) for three MgO powders.”
The legend of Figure 11:
“Mass loss (%) measured by TGA-MS as a function of BET surface area (m^2^/g). Mass loss was calculated by subtracting the relative change in mass (%) at 700 °C from 100.”
now reads:
“MgO nanopowder characterization prior to experiments using microscopy. (a) Bright Field Transmission Electron Microscopy (BF-TEM) image of AA, (b) Secondary electron scanning electron microscopy (SE-SEM) image of AA. (c) BF-TEM image of BTC, (d) SE-SEM image of BTC, (e) BF-TEM image of SS, (f) SE-SEM image of SS.”
The legend of Figure 12:
“Weight% nesquehonite (%) as a function of surface area (m^2^/g) for three MgO powders.”
now reads:
“Mass loss (%) measured by TGA-MS as a function of BET surface area (m2/g). Mass loss was calculated by subtracting the relative change in mass (%) at 700 °C from 100.”
The original Article has been corrected.