# Adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with clinical T3–4 oral and oropharyngeal cancer who achieved major pathologic response after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery: a propensity score-matched retrospective study

**Authors:** Menghua Li, Shiyan Yang, Lili Liu, Wanming Hu, Shida Yan, Yani Zhang, Mingyuan Du, Xianlu Gao, Chulin Yang, Liji Zheng, Chunyan Chen, Jian Zhou, Jiabin Lu, Ming Song, Shuwei Chen

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1681587 · Frontiers in Immunology · 2026-01-20

## TL;DR

This study finds that skipping adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery and treatment for advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer leads to worse outcomes.

## Contribution

The study uses propensity score matching to show that adjuvant radiotherapy improves survival outcomes in patients with major pathologic response.

## Key findings

- Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improved local and locoregional recurrence-free survival.
- Omitting radiotherapy did not improve distant metastasis-free or overall survival.
- Benefits of radiotherapy were maintained in patients with ypT0–2 tumors.

## Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy results in high pathologic response rates in locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OC/OPC). It is unclear if patients with clinical T3-4 (cT3-4) OC/OPC at initial diagnosis can safely omit adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after significant pathological downstaging.

This retrospective cohort study included cT3–4 OC/OPC patients who achieved a major pathologic response (MPR) after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between July 2019 and May 2024. Patients were categorized by whether they received ART. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between cohorts.

A total of 247 patients were eligible, with a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR, 20-41). The 2-year survival outcomes were favorable: LRFS 93.4%, LRRFS 85.0%, DMFS 95.6%, and OS 93.0%. In the matched cohorts (74 pairs), ART significantly improved 2-year LRFS (100% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.001), and LRRFS (91.5% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.014), but not DMFS (96.4% vs. 95.6%, p = 0.740), and OS (96.5% vs. 90.0%, p = 0.093). These benefits remained significant among patients with ypT0–2 tumors after matching.

Omitting ART in patients with cT3–4 OC/OPC who achieve MPR after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery significantly compromises oncological outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to optimize adaptive de-escalation strategies for this population.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** oral cancer (MONDO:0023644), oropharyngeal cancer (MONDO:0004608)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** OC/OPC (MESH:C564935), tumors (MESH:D009369), T3-4 oral and oropharyngeal cancer (MESH:D009959), distant metastasis (MESH:D009362)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864408/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864408/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864408/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864408