# Continuous infusion OPAT via elastomeric pumps: effectiveness, safety, and cost-saving potential in a real-world Italian cohort

**Authors:** Stella Babich, Stefano Di Bella, Raffaele De Rivo, Oyewole Christopher Durojaiye, Antonio Lovecchio, Andrea Misin, Madalina Straciug, Ylenia Gobbo, Angela Dellaluce, Michela Palmolungo, Massimiliano Fabricci, Filippo Giorgio Di Girolamo, Chiara Roni, Jacopo Monticelli

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s15010-025-02671-0 · Infection · 2025-10-31

## TL;DR

This study shows that using elastomeric pumps for outpatient antibiotic treatment in Italy is effective, safe, and saves significant costs compared to inpatient care.

## Contribution

Demonstrates real-world effectiveness and cost savings of elastomeric pump-based OPAT over six years in an Italian hospital setting.

## Key findings

- Clinical cure was achieved in 85.5% of patients using elastomeric pump-based OPAT.
- The treatment resulted in a 92% cost reduction compared to estimated inpatient care costs.
- Adverse events were low, with most being vascular access-related and drug-related events occurring in 13.75% of treatments.

## Abstract

To evaluate clinical outcomes, safety, patient-reported satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness of elastomeric pump-based Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) over six years at an Italian tertiary center.

This retrospective single-center study included 76 adult patients treated with continuous-infusion OPAT via elastomeric pumps between 2019 and 2024 at the University Hospital of Trieste, Italy.

A total of 1,934 elastomeric pump-based OPAT days were delivered (median duration of 22.9 days). Clinical cure was achieved in 85.5% of patients; recurrence and failure occurred in 6.2% and 7.9%, respectively. Most frequent indications were skin/soft tissue and surgical site infections (25.9%), complicated urinary tract infections (22.4%), and bone/joint infections (16.4%). Pathogens were mainly Gram-negative (70.7%), including Enterobacterales (40.2%, 57.6% ESBL-producing), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26.8%), and Staphylococcus aureus (17.1%, 28.6% methicillin-resistant S. aureus). The most used antibiotics were piperacillin/tazobactam (51.3%), cefepime (12.5%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (7.5%). Adverse events were observed in 13.75% of treatments, primarily vascular access-related (5.7 events/1,000 OPAT-days); drug-related adverse events occurred in 7.8% of patients (3.1 events/1,000 OPAT-days). Among contacted patients (75% response rate), 83.7% expressed willingness to reuse the pump. Total OPAT costs were €62,190.64 compared to an estimated €773,600.00 for inpatient care, yielding a 92% cost reduction (€711,409 saved).

Elastomeric pump-based OPAT is a clinically effective, well-tolerated, and economically advantageous option for selected infections. Its integration into stewardship programs supports broader implementation within modern, sustainable infectious disease care models.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** piperacillin/tazobactam (PubChem CID 461573), cefepime (PubChem CID 5479537), ceftolozane/tazobactam (PubChem CID 86291594)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infectious disease (MESH:D003141), infections (MESH:D007239), urinary tract infections (MESH:D014552), bone/joint infections (MESH:D001847)
- **Chemicals:** piperacillin/tazobactam (MESH:D000077725), ceftolozane/tazobactam (MESH:C000594038), cefepime (MESH:D000077723), methicillin (MESH:D008712)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Pseudomonas aeruginosa (species) [taxon 287], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280], Enterobacterales (order) [taxon 91347]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864358/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864358/full.md

## References

1 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864358/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12864358