# Long-term outcomes of Kono-S anastomosis for ileocecal resections in Crohn’s disease: a comparative analysis

## TL;DR

This study compares long-term outcomes of Kono-S and conventional anastomosis techniques after ileocecal resections in Crohn's disease patients, finding no significant differences in recurrence or quality of life.

## Contribution

The study provides high-quality long-term data on Kono-S anastomosis in real-world settings, addressing a gap in existing evidence.

## Key findings

- No significant differences were observed in recurrence rates, complications, or quality of life between Kono-S and conventional anastomosis groups.
- Approximately 40% of patients expressed a preference for earlier surgical intervention, regardless of anastomotic technique.
- Kono-S anastomosis shows comparable long-term outcomes to conventional techniques after over 7 years of follow-up.

## Abstract

This long-term follow-up study evaluates clinical and functional outcomes after ileocecal resection with either Kono-S or conventional anastomosis techniques in patients with Crohn’s disease. The goal was to determine whether the Kono-S approach confers a long-term advantage in preventing disease recurrence and improving quality of life.

While the Kono-S anastomosis has shown promise in reducing recurrence rates in Crohn’s disease following surgery, most existing evidence stems from short- to medium-term follow-up. High-quality long-term data remain scarce, particularly in real-world clinical settings. This study aims to fill that gap.

A retrospective-prospective cohort analysis was performed including patients who underwent ileocecal resection for Crohn’s disease between 2015 and 2017 at a single academic center. Patients were grouped according to anastomosis technique (Kono-S vs. conventional). Long-term follow-up data were obtained via chart review, imaging studies, and patient-reported questionnaires, including the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Primary outcomes included recurrence rates, postoperative complications, and quality of life.

Seventy patients were included in the final analysis (Kono-S: n = 31; conventional: n = 39). The median follow-up duration was 8.1 years (interquartile range = 6.9–8.8 years). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding endoscopic inflammation (Kono-S = 19.4%, conventional = 25.6%, p = 0.39), restenosis (Kono-S = 9.7%, conventional = 2.6%, p = 0.34), or GIQLI scores (Kono-S: median 116 vs. 110, p = 0.08). Rehospitalization rates were numerically higher in the Kono-S group (16.1% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.0), but not statistically significant. Importantly, approximately 40% of all patients retrospectively stated they would have preferred earlier surgical intervention, independent of the anastomotic technique.

After more than 7 years of follow-up, the Kono-S anastomosis demonstrates comparable long-term outcomes to conventional techniques in terms of recurrence, complications, and quality of life. Patient reflections suggest a potential benefit of earlier surgical intervention, highlighting the need for more proactive surgical referral in gastroenterological practice.