# Non-destructive DNA extraction for recovering mitochondrial genomes from museum grasshopper specimens

**Authors:** Hao Tang, Jiayi Zou, Keyao Zhang, Huateng Huang, Marta Ciucani, Marta Ciucani, Marta Ciucani, Marta Ciucani

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341621 · PLOS One · 2026-02-02

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a non-destructive DNA extraction method for museum grasshopper specimens, enabling mitochondrial genome recovery without damaging the specimens.

## Contribution

A novel, non-destructive DNA extraction protocol for museum grasshopper specimens that allows mitochondrial genome assembly.

## Key findings

- The protocol successfully extracted DNA from 6–43-year-old grasshopper specimens for mitochondrial genome assembly.
- Younger specimens yielded better DNA results, but older ones still provided usable mitochondrial data.
- The method is cost-effective and requires minimal molecular expertise, making it widely adoptable.

## Abstract

Museum collections of grasshoppers contain valuable genetic data for evolutionary, ecological, and systematic studies, but destructive sampling and complex molecular techniques often limit their use. This study presents a simple, non-destructive DNA extraction protocol designed for dried grasshopper specimens, effectively balancing DNA yield with morphological preservation. We tested this method on specimens aged 6–43 years, exploring various lysis conditions to optimize DNA recovery while maintaining specimen integrity. The protocol successfully extracted sufficient DNA to assemble mitochondrial genomes for most samples using cost-effective low-coverage shotgun sequencing. DNA from younger specimens produced the best results, while older samples (over 40 years) showed some challenges, though post-collection damage did not significantly affect mitochondrial sequence assembly. Additionally, we provide practical bioinformatics recommendations for processing short reads from dried specimens. Requiring minimal molecular expertise and relying on standard sequencing services, this accessible method is well-suited for widespread adoption. By unlocking genetic insights from museum collections, it offers new opportunities to deepen our understanding of grasshopper evolution and ecological dynamics.

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CDS1 (CDP-diacylglycerol synthase 1) [NCBI Gene 1040] {aka CDS 1}
- **Chemicals:** DTAB (MESH:C013912), chloroform (MESH:D002725), ethanol (MESH:D000431), poly-G (MESH:D011068), 17STF (-), CTAB (MESH:D000077286), Silica (MESH:D012822), uracil (MESH:D014498), NO (MESH:D009614)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Diabolocatantops pinguis (species) [taxon 509737], Caelifera (grasshoppers, groundhoppers & pygmy mole crickets, suborder) [taxon 7001], Malaza fastuosus (species) [taxon 2497113], Schistocerca gregaria (desert locust, species) [taxon 7010]
- **Mutations:** C > T, G > A, G > A 3, C>T 5

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863550/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863550/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863550/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863550