# Construction of the core competencies training system for thoracic surgery specialist nurses: A mixed-methods study

**Authors:** Yingjin Li, Yan Chen, Qiuju Chen, Di Zhu, Ping Xia, Yuqin Mao, Liumei Yin, Saijun Ba, Emma Campbell, Vinit Ramawat, Vinit Ramawat

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339777 · PLOS One · 2026-02-02

## TL;DR

This study created a training system for thoracic surgery nurses by combining expert input and research, aiming to improve clinical care and nursing standards.

## Contribution

A novel mixed-methods approach was used to develop a structured training system for thoracic surgery specialist nurses.

## Key findings

- A core competency framework with 6 first-level and 17 second-level indicators was established.
- 92 curriculum items, 17 organizational aspects, and 8 evaluation methods were defined through expert consultation.
- The system achieved high expert agreement and practical relevance for nursing education and healthcare.

## Abstract

To develop a training system for cultivating the core competencies of thoracic surgery specialist nurses.

A mixed-methods study was employed, comprising two stages: (1) A literature review and semi-structured interviews with thoracic surgical healthcare professionals were conducted to develop a preliminary core competencies training system for thoracic surgery specialist nurses; (2) A two-round Delphi expert consultation was conducted to determine the final training system.

Consensus was reached on the core competency framework (training objectives) (6 first-level, 17 second-level indicators), 92 items of curriculum content along with their corresponding teaching methods, 17 aspects of organizational management, and 8 evaluation methods. The response rate was 100%. The authority coefficient was 0.895. The Kendall’s coefficients for the two rounds of expert inquiry were 0.141 and 0.210, respectively.

This study developed a scientific, comprehensive specialty training system for thoracic surgery specialist nurses, meeting practical nursing needs, and enriching the field’s evidence base. It delivers substantial clinical and practical value to nursing administrators, practitioners, patients, and the healthcare system. Future research should validate its practical value through larger-scale empirical studies, continuously gather feedback on training outcomes, refine the training system, and further enhance its adaptability and influence.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Thoracic Surgery (MESH:D013896), Esophageal cancer (MESH:D004938), pulmonary complications (MESH:D008171), thoracic tumor (MESH:D013899), postoperative complication (MESH:D011183), trauma (MESH:D014947), cancer (MESH:D009369), lung cancer (MESH:D008175), postoperative (MESH:D019106)
- **Chemicals:** PONE-D-25-47557R1 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863540/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863540/full.md

## References

44 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863540/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863540