# Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery: a comparative assessment of outcomes, complications, recovery, and cost

**Authors:** Ahmed Abdulrahman Al-Saeed, Ghannam Alghannam

PMC · DOI: 10.25122/jml-2025-0139 · Journal of Medicine and Life · 2025-12-01

## TL;DR

This paper compares robotic and laparoscopic surgery, finding that robotic surgery offers better precision and recovery in complex cases, while laparoscopic surgery is more cost-effective and faster for routine procedures.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery across outcomes, complications, recovery, and cost in various surgical specialties.

## Key findings

- Robotic-assisted surgery improves surgical precision and reduces complications in complex procedures.
- Laparoscopic surgery is more cost-effective and has shorter operating times for routine cases.
- Comparing the two techniques is challenging due to their distinct advantages in different contexts.

## Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized modern surgical practice, reducing trauma, speeding recovery, and improving surgical accuracy. Robot-assisted surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical technique as an alternative to laparoscopic surgery. However, determining which of the two surgical techniques is more effective across different surgical specialties remains a matter of research. This narrative review aimed to compare robotic-assisted surgery with laparoscopic surgery with respect to patient outcomes, complications, recovery time, and cost. Studies published in PubMed and ScienceDirect were used, with a focus on studies published between 2015 and 2025. Also, studies that compared both techniques through various specialties were included. Robot-assisted surgery showed positive results by improving surgical precision, reducing the need for conversion to open surgery, and resulting in fewer complications and faster functional recovery in some procedures. However, laparoscopic surgery showed superior results in lowering surgical costs and ease of access, with shorter operating times than robotic-assisted surgery. Both robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery offer advantages that make comparing them difficult. Robotic-assisted surgery was better for complex surgical procedures that required high precision. However, laparoscopic surgery was superior for routine cases requiring shorter operating times. Further research and prospective, high-quality, and multicenter studies are still needed to better define the optimal application of each surgical approach.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** trauma (MESH:D014947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863096/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863096/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863096/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12863096