# Tuina therapy plus resistance exercise vs. Tuina alone for mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

**Authors:** San Zheng, Zhiwei Wu, Yaping Chang, Hua Xing, Yiming Shan, Yangyang Fu, Yazhou Li, Zhiran Kang, Jintian Chen, Jiangshan Li, Jie Li, Junliang Wang, Min Fang, Wuquan Sun

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1709232 · Frontiers in Medicine · 2026-01-19

## TL;DR

This study found that combining Tuina therapy with resistance exercise is more effective than Tuina alone for reducing neck pain and improving function.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence that adding resistance exercise to Tuina therapy improves outcomes for mechanical neck pain.

## Key findings

- TTRE group showed greater pain reduction compared to Tuina alone.
- Participants in TTRE had better functional recovery and improved muscle strength.
- TTRE led to increased cervical range of motion compared to Tuina alone.

## Abstract

Tuina and exercise therapy are widely used to treat mechanical neck pain (MNP), but evidence on their combined efficacy remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Tuina combined with resistance exercise (RE) versus Tuina alone in managing MNP.

We conducted a 4-week, analyst-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 90 participants with MNP. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either Tuina Therapy plus RE (TTRE, n = 45) or Tuina alone (n = 45). Both groups underwent two Tuina sessions per week for 4 weeks (eight sessions in total). In addition, the TTRE group performed RE three times daily for 4 weeks. Each RE consisted of 5 s of static resistance followed by 2 s of relaxation. The number of repetitions per session increased progressively: 5 in week 1, 10 in week 2, 15 in week 3, and 20 in week 4. The primary outcome was the change in pain visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes included the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, peak strength of cervical muscle (PSCM), cervical range of motion (CROM), cervical curvature (Cobb Angle), and adverse events.

The mean age of the 90 enrolled patients was 26.4 years [standard deviation (SD), 3.1 and 49 (54.4%) were female]. The mean difference in VAS scores from baseline at week 4 for TTRE group was −4.2 (95% CI, −4.4 to −4.0). At week 4, the difference in VAS score was 0.5(95% CI, 0.30 to 0.77; p < 0.001) between Tuina group and TTRE group.

In this study, participants with MNP in the TTRE group showed statistically greater improvements than those in the Tuina group in pain reduction, functional recovery, extension PSCM, and flexion CROM at week 4. TTRE may be considered a valuable option in the management of MNP.

We registered the trial with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068344; Registration Date: February 15, 2023) at http://www.chictr.org.cn.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Neck Disability (MESH:D006258), MNP (MESH:D019547), pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Chemicals:** TTRE (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12862936/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12862936/full.md

## References

66 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12862936/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12862936